LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


February 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<No subject> (1 message)
Ada and Embedded Systems (2 messages)
Ada Design tools (10 messages)
Ada for Wintel box (4 messages)
Adasockets - where to get it now? (4 messages)
Announce: Ada 95 & 83 Public Classes March & April in Carlsbad (1 message)
any interest in a separate forum for targeting the JVM? (2 messages)
AVM vs. JVM (19 messages)
Calling a function by address (5 messages)
DC SIGAda Next Meeting (1 message)
Definition of Open Source was RE: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source! (1 message)
exaggeration for effect (1 message)
FW: SE-book 6.ed (1 message)
FW: Workshop Ada at Brest (1 message)
HP reputation ??? (off-topic) (1 message)
Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed) (4 messages)
Looking for Ada work... (2 messages)
Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source! (35 messages)
Myths about C++ (1 message)
New AdaSDL update. (1 message)
Now I'm REALLY off-topic. (1 message)
NSA and FAA Certification (3 messages)
On the other hand..... (1 message)
Open Source and Microsoft (1 message)
Pascal Standard Process (was: The Good and Bad News about Java) (2 messages)
Precision Munitions (Offshoot of Re: sucky software) (2 messages)
Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed) (27 messages)
Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book.6ed) (1 message)
QDI was Sucky Software (1 message)
SE-book 6.ed (8 messages)
SIGAda DC Chapter Meeting (1 message)
Subject: $$$ Opportunity $50000 in 90 Days $$$ (1 message)
sucky software (8 messages)
sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java) (10 messages)
Technical Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652:1995 (1 message)
Technical Question (18 messages)
The AVM (12 messages)
The Good and Bad News about Java (32 messages)
The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl (2 messages)
The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl ass languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)) (2 messages)
The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)) (5 messages)
The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems withC-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)) (1 message)
unsubscribe please!!!! (2 messages)
Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM) (9 messages)
Virus Report to Sender (1 message)
Without dongle CAD software collection. (1 message)
[[log in to unmask]: programming languages as a core topic] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Jill

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:52:27 +0800

50 lines

New Thread

Ada and Embedded Systems

Re: Ada and Embedded Systems

Roepe, Marsha S.

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:45:54 -0500

52 lines

Ada and Embedded Systems

S. Ron Oliver

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 08:18:06 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Ada Design tools

Re: Ada Design tools

<>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:40:34 +0000

35 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

Simon Wright

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 07:28:53 +0000

73 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

<>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:48:40 +0000

26 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

Greg Bek

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:30:40 -0800

58 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

Simon Wright

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:41:13 +0000

50 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

Mark Lundquist

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:11:37 -0800

37 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

<>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:34:57 -0700

55 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

<>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:23:10 -0700

95 lines

Re: Ada Design tools

Greg Bek

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:48:51 -0800

65 lines

Ada Design tools

<>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:36:51 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Ada for Wintel box

Re: Ada for Wintel box

Randy Brukardt

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:34:29 -0600

54 lines

Re: Ada for Wintel box

Pascal Obry

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:28:29 +0100

34 lines

Re: Ada for Wintel box

Anh Vo

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 16:30:36 -0500

10 lines

Ada for Wintel box

afguerra

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:37:39 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Adasockets - where to get it now?

Re: Adasockets - where to get it now?

Pascal Obry

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:50:58 +0100

34 lines

Re: Adasockets - where to get it now?

Jerry van Dijk

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:50:13 +0100

23 lines

Re: Adasockets - where to get it now?

David C. Hoos, Sr.

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:33:44 -0600

35 lines

Adasockets - where to get it now?

Brakewood, Marcus x12479a2

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:25:53 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Announce: Ada 95 & 83 Public Classes March & April in Carlsbad

Announce: Ada 95 & 83 Public Classes March & April in Carlsbad

Edward Colbert

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:45:52 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

any interest in a separate forum for targeting the JVM?

Re: any interest in a separate forum for targeting the JVM?

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:17:56 -0800

51 lines

Re: any interest in a separate forum for targeting the JVM?

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:22:52 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

AVM vs. JVM

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Pascal Obry

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:19:20 +0100

29 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

S. Ron Oliver

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:34:24 -0700

154 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:14:33 -0500

22 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Pascal Obry

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:41:45 +0100

34 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:31:02 -0800

65 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:12:58 -0500

18 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Tom Moran

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:32:21 -0800

12 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:03:29 -0500

34 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:55:47 -0700

37 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Pascal Obry

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:48:15 +0100

42 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:52:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:54:39 -0700

40 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Tom Moran

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:20:38 -0800

15 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Terry Westley

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:09:26 -0500

45 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:48:07 -0800

106 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Pascal Obry

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:02:45 +0100

67 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:44:06 -0800

69 lines

Re: AVM vs. JVM

Pascal Obry

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:46:44 +0100

53 lines

AVM vs. JVM

Terry Westley

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:43:24 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Calling a function by address

Re: Calling a function by address

Tom Moran

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:34:14 -0800

14 lines

Re: Calling a function by address

<>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:54:50 +0000

97 lines

Re: Calling a function by address

Tom Moran

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:37:09 -0800

22 lines

Re: Calling a function by address

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:39:36 -0700

39 lines

Calling a function by address

Doran, Steven

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:34:41 -0800

11 lines

New Thread

DC SIGAda Next Meeting

DC SIGAda Next Meeting

Jeff Castellow

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:53:06 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Definition of Open Source was RE: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Definition of Open Source was RE: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:23:48 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

exaggeration for effect

Re: exaggeration for effect

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:34:21 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

FW: SE-book 6.ed

FW: SE-book 6.ed

<>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:33:53 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

FW: Workshop Ada at Brest

FW: Workshop Ada at Brest

Carlisle Martin C Dr USAFA/DFCS

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:36:00 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

HP reputation ??? (off-topic)

Re: HP reputation ??? (off-topic)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:12:43 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed)

Re: Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:49:23 +0200

16 lines

Re: Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed)

Marie D'Abato

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:43:24 -0700

78 lines

Re: Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed)

Michael Feldman

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:28:50 -0500

49 lines

Java as a 1st language? (was Re: Re: SE-book 6.ed)

Ben Brosgol

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:31:01 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Looking for Ada work...

Re: Looking for Ada work...

Anh Vo

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:24:09 -0500

16 lines

Re: Looking for Ada work...

<>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 06:54:49 EST

16 lines

New Thread

Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:46:38 +0300

21 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Crispen, Bob

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:22:41 -0600

119 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Tom Moran

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:57:11 -0800

25 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Crispen, Bob

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:15:31 -0600

83 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Tom Moran

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:39:19 -0800

18 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:19:40 -0800

72 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robin P Reagan

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 08:14:36 -0700

51 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Simon Wright

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 20:26:21 +0000

52 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

<>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:22:45 +0000

30 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Jacob Sparre Andersen

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:06:30 +0100

72 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Tom Moran

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:49:46 -0800

28 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:28:51 -0500

39 lines

Re: Microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:26:12 -0800

51 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Tom Moran

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:24:21 -0800

18 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:06:07 +0300

48 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Michael Feldman

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:20:47 -0500

43 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Stephen Leake

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:34:32 -0500

31 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Roger Racine

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:57:01 -0500

28 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robin P Reagan

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:38:33 -0700

42 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 02:02:28 +0300

18 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:40:00 -0500

21 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:53:15 -0500

22 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Michael Feldman

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:53:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Tom Moran

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:46:24 -0800

17 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:23:43 -0500

19 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Michael Feldman

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:40:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:03:16 -0500

27 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robin P Reagan

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:43:48 -0700

43 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Crispen, Bob

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:50:42 -0600

74 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

<>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:37:02 +0000

43 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

jim hopper

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:19:11 -0500

67 lines

microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

<>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:44:11 +0000

26 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:54:05 -0800

142 lines

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

Michael Feldman

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:22:05 -0500

78 lines

microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

jim hopper

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:25:40 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Myths about C++

Myths about C++

S. Ron Oliver

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 08:46:25 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

New AdaSDL update.

New AdaSDL update.

vargas

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 03:01:16 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Now I'm REALLY off-topic.

Now I'm REALLY off-topic.

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:53:34 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

NSA and FAA Certification

Re: NSA and FAA Certification

Panfil, Thomas A

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:50:15 -0500

93 lines

Re: NSA and FAA Certification

Ada Marketing

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:13:18 -0500

69 lines

NSA and FAA Certification

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:04:34 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

On the other hand.....

Re: On the other hand.....

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:38:26 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Open Source and Microsoft

Open Source and Microsoft

Michael Feldman

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:46:32 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Pascal Standard Process (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Re: Pascal Standard Process (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:10:52 -0500

23 lines

Pascal Standard Process (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Stephen Schwarm

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:30:47 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

Precision Munitions (Offshoot of Re: sucky software)

Re: Precision Munitions (Offshoot of Re: sucky software)

Al Christians

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:48:15 -0800

43 lines

Precision Munitions (Offshoot of Re: sucky software)

Tony Lowe

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:33:45 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:18:45 -0500

13 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Colin Paul Gloster

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:50:14 -0500

46 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Carlisle Martin C Dr USAFA/DFCS

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:15:01 -0700

112 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Colin Paul Gloster

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:06:51 -0500

78 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:24:36 +0000

48 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Colin Paul Gloster

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:06:06 -0500

63 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Stephen Schwarm

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:52:50 -0500

51 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:44:44 +0000

45 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:38:27 +0000

53 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 02:39:17 +0300

39 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Pascal Obry

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:43:35 +0100

37 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 00:40:49 +0300

85 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Stephen Schwarm

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:03:46 -0500

44 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:46:05 +0000

52 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 20:43:05 +0300

33 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:49:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:58:00 -0500

17 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

<>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:43:13 +0000

29 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:02:30 +0300

13 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:00:18 -0500

39 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Colin Paul Gloster

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:21:15 -0500

50 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:40:50 -0700

40 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:44:31 -0500

42 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:09:10 -0800

95 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:51:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:37:17 -0500

18 lines

Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed)

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:00:08 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book.6ed)

Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book.6ed)

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:38:14 +0300

69 lines

New Thread

QDI was Sucky Software

QDI was Sucky Software

JF Harrison

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:46:19 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

SE-book 6.ed

Re: SE-book 6.ed

Michael Feldman

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:31:51 -0500

45 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:14:35 -0700

37 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:06:43 -0700

37 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:02:27 -0700

34 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

Alan Barnes

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:11:44 +0000

66 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

Jim Briggs

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:53:12 +0000

46 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:02:41 -0500

19 lines

Re: SE-book 6.ed

Colin Paul Gloster

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 04:49:11 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

SIGAda DC Chapter Meeting

SIGAda DC Chapter Meeting

Jeff Castellow

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 21:28:06 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Subject: $$$ Opportunity $50000 in 90 Days $$$

Subject: $$$ Opportunity $50000 in 90 Days $$$

Stefan Diaconescu

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:41:13 +0200

533 lines

New Thread

sucky software

Re: sucky software

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:29:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: sucky software

Jacob Sparre Andersen

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:58:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: sucky software

Tony Lowe

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:40:32 -0600

31 lines

Re: sucky software

<>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:15:49 +0000

33 lines

Re: sucky software

Tom Moran

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:34:37 -0800

16 lines

Re: sucky software

Al Christians

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 00:07:11 -0800

73 lines

Re: sucky software

Ed Falis

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:51:26 -0500

20 lines

Re: sucky software

JF Harrison

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:59:50 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:33:53 -0500

14 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Alan and Carmel Brain

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 00:06:31 +1100

26 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

C. Daniel Cooper

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:41:46 -0800

38 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

C. Daniel Cooper

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:27:23 -0800

80 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Roger Racine

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:28:22 -0500

73 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Dale Jr, William

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:27:30 -0800

63 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:41:53 -0700

40 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

<>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:03:46 +0000

30 lines

Re: sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

Deller, Steve

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:11:49 -0800

78 lines

sucky software (was: The Good and Bad News about Java)

C. Daniel Cooper

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:00:52 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Technical Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652:1995

Technical Corrigendum to ISO/IEC 8652:1995

Joyce L. Tokar

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 14:33:10 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Technical Question

Re: Technical Question

<>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:28:30 +0000

36 lines

Re: Technical Question

Taylor, Bill - UK

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:53:47 +0100

65 lines

Re: Technical Question

Simon Wright

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 07:07:29 +0000

35 lines

Re: Technical Question

Jeffrey Carter

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:57:45 -0600

78 lines

Re: Technical Question

Mark Lundquist

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:11:48 -0800

82 lines

Technical Question

<>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:55:08 +0000

151 lines

Re: Technical Question

<>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:53:38 -0500

36 lines

Re: Technical Question

Mark Lundquist

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:55:06 -0800

30 lines

Re: Technical Question

Mark Lundquist

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:15:37 -0800

73 lines

Re: Technical Question

Mark Lundquist

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:46:48 -0800

48 lines

Re: Technical Question

Greg Bek

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:51:39 -0800

94 lines

Re: Technical Question

Deller, Steve

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:49:53 -0800

59 lines

Re: Technical Question

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:00:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: Technical Question

<>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:59:39 +0000

36 lines

Re: Technical Question

Taylor, Bill - UK

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:11:18 +0100

75 lines

Re: Technical Question

Tucker Taft

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:01:44 -0500

42 lines

Re: Technical Question

Jacob Sparre Andersen

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:31:50 +0100

52 lines

Technical Question

<>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:38:30 +0000

152 lines

New Thread

The AVM

Re: The AVM

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:07:08 -0800

53 lines

Re: The AVM

Dave Taylor

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:05:08 -0600

36 lines

Re: The AVM

Pascal Obry

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:21:33 +0100

58 lines

Re: The AVM

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:26:06 -0500

17 lines

Re: The AVM

Michael Feldman

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:30:53 -0500

55 lines

Re: The AVM

Stephane Richard

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:21:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: The AVM

Tucker Taft

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:11:44 -0500

59 lines

Re: The AVM

S. Ron Oliver

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:22:21 -0700

51 lines

Re: The AVM

Jacob Sparre Andersen

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:04:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: The AVM

Terry Westley

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:27:47 -0500

23 lines

Re: The AVM

Terry Westley

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:44:20 -0500

27 lines

The AVM

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:44:11 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

The Good and Bad News about Java

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Colin Paul Gloster

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:24:35 -0500

38 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:01:01 -0700

57 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

<>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:13:58 +0000

49 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:49:16 -0500

57 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:34:41 -0700

101 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Johnson Phillip E

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:12:58 -0600

47 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:30:41 -0700

131 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Johnson Phillip E

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:02:40 -0600

51 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:41:33 -0700

67 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:54:57 -0500

21 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Jerry van Dijk

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 21:32:51 +0100

29 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:57:06 -0500

46 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Stephen Schwarm

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:38:23 -0500

53 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:15:01 -0500

88 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

<>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:33:33 +0000

38 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Al Christians

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:41:58 -0800

31 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:53:22 -0500

38 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

<>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:38:51 +0000

53 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:52:49 -0500

73 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:30:40 -0500

44 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:50:20 -0700

80 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Colin Paul Gloster

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:41:24 -0500

70 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:44:57 -0500

58 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Brashear, Phil

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:08:46 -0500

104 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:40:28 -0700

53 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

<>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:53:42 +0200

52 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Michael Feldman

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:33:10 -0500

64 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Jeffrey Carter

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:25:20 -0600

32 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

<>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 21:30:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Jean-Pierre Rosen

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:19:44 +0100

21 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:18:29 -0700

51 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

Randy Brukardt

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:45:18 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl

Mark Lundquist

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:14:51 -0800

24 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl

Michael Feldman

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:01:04 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl ass languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl ass languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:59:13 -0700

39 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-cl ass languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Johnson Phillip E

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:03:25 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Jean-Pierre Rosen

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:25:18 +0100

19 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:22:29 -0800

112 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:51:39 -0700

38 lines

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Stephane Richard

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:48:08 +0100

128 lines

The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems with C-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

S. Ron Oliver

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:12:59 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems withC-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java (was Re: Problems withC-class languages ( wasRe: SE-book 6.ed))

Lionel Draghi

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:07:27 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe please!!!!

unsubscribe please!!!!

Bob Mathis

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:20:07 -0500

11 lines

unsubscribe please!!!!

<>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 09:53:12 +0000

10 lines

New Thread

Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:18:25 -0800

41 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Tom Moran

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:34:02 -0800

17 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:26:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

S. Ron Oliver

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:59:17 -0700

65 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Jacob Sparre Andersen

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:39:57 +0100

68 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:04:17 -0500

19 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Michael Feldman

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:56:38 -0500

61 lines

Re: Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

Terry Westley

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:44:38 -0500

25 lines

Validation/quality (Re: AVM vs. JVM)

W. Wesley Groleau x4923

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:27:49 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Virus Report to Sender

Re: Virus Report to Sender

<>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 06:54:51 EST

33 lines

New Thread

Without dongle CAD software collection.

Without dongle CAD software collection.

3DCAD

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 03:37:34 +0300

22 lines

New Thread

[[log in to unmask]: programming languages as a core topic]

[[log in to unmask]: programming languages as a core topic]

Laurent Guerby

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:34:13 +0100

41 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager