LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


February 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

ADA using a DLL file (2 messages)
Designing for Ada 95? (30 messages)
ESA Artemis recovery - Ada ? (1 message)
Extensive Coverage of Ada in FEB 2003 CrossTalk (1 message)
Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today... (4 messages)
GNAT on Windows (Re: ADA using a DLL file (3 messages)
Happy 25th Anniversary to Blue, Green, Red and Yellow (was Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...) (1 message)
oops ;-) (1 message)
programming language poll at slashdot (2 messages)
re TCPIP package or binding (1 message)
Sorted Units list with OA 7.22 (1 message)
TCPIP package or binding (1 message)
TCPIP package or binding? (12 messages)
Volunteers sought for SIGAda ESC-West booth (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

New Thread

ADA using a DLL file

ADA using a DLL file

Steven Lim

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:52:20 +0800

18 lines

Re: ADA using a DLL file

Laurent Guerby

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:52:24 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Designing for Ada 95?

Designing for Ada 95?

Steven Lim

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:09:56 +0800

14 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Wojtek Narczynski

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:58:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:11:19 -0500

63 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

David C. Hoos

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:11:05 -0600

34 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Wojtek Narczynski

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:17:54 +0100

26 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:53:33 -0500

60 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:02:06 +0300

23 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:03:18 -0500

41 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:09:57 -0500

76 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Jeffrey Carter

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:26:50 -0700

19 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Jeffrey Carter

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:31:55 -0700

26 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Tony Lowe

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:04:55 -0600

37 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Stephen Leake

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:57:07 -0500

40 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:15:27 GMT

25 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:23:15 GMT

31 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:28:49 GMT

18 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:52:22 GMT

47 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:59:33 GMT

19 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Jens Jakob Jensen

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:31:55 +0100

19 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:27:49 -0500

49 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Bruce Hennessy

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:48:11 -0500

36 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 02:11:21 +0300

23 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Wojtek Narczynski

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 01:15:26 +0100

26 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Steven Lim

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:20:37 +0800

61 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Steven Lim

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:22:19 +0800

82 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Marc A. Criley

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 06:28:30 -0600

26 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:01:33 GMT

26 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Peter Amey

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:40:18 -0000

86 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Wojtek Narczynski

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:47:32 +0100

24 lines

Re: Designing for Ada 95?

Simon Wright

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 20:09:59 GMT

59 lines

New Thread

ESA Artemis recovery - Ada ?

ESA Artemis recovery - Ada ?

Laurent Guerby

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:14:48 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Extensive Coverage of Ada in FEB 2003 CrossTalk

Extensive Coverage of Ada in FEB 2003 CrossTalk

Thomas A. Panfil

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:19:28 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...

Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...

Dirk Craeynest

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:48:11 +0100

54 lines

Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...

Jeffrey Carter

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 18:08:44 -0700

22 lines

Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...

Dirk Craeynest

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:45:15 +0100

18 lines

Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...

Christoph & Ursula Grein

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:12:23 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

GNAT on Windows (Re: ADA using a DLL file

GNAT on Windows (Re: ADA using a DLL file

Peter Hermann

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:56:36 +0100

37 lines

Re: GNAT on Windows (Re: ADA using a DLL file

Laurent Guerby

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:17:26 +0100

49 lines

Re: GNAT on Windows (Re: ADA using a DLL file

Stephen D. B. Wolthusen

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:38:50 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Happy 25th Anniversary to Blue, Green, Red and Yellow (was Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...)

Happy 25th Anniversary to Blue, Green, Red and Yellow (was Re: Feb 17 - It was 20 years ago today...)

Ben Brosgol

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:56:45 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

oops ;-)

oops ;-)

james hopper

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:46:29 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

programming language poll at slashdot

programming language poll at slashdot

james hopper

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:44:35 -0500

13 lines

Re: programming language poll at slashdot

David Retherford

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:51:20 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

re TCPIP package or binding

re TCPIP package or binding

Tom Moran

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:56:29 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

Sorted Units list with OA 7.22

Sorted Units list with OA 7.22

Bruce Hennessy

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:31:07 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

TCPIP package or binding

Re: TCPIP package or binding

Michael Feldman

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:24:59 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

TCPIP package or binding?

TCPIP package or binding?

Michael Feldman

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:50:50 -0500

28 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

james hopper

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:33:54 -0500

25 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

David C. Hoos, Sr.

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:41:10 -0600

46 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Simon Wright

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:52:59 GMT

16 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Wojtek Narczynski

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:00:59 +0100

24 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

james hopper

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 07:39:52 -0500

29 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Samuel Tardieu

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:25:44 +0100

28 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Pascal Obry

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:24:17 +0100

34 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

james hopper

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:50:36 -0500

47 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Laurent Pautet

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:13:03 +0100

55 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Laurent Pautet

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:09:58 +0100

55 lines

Re: TCPIP package or binding?

Simon Wright

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:45:13 GMT

29 lines

New Thread

Volunteers sought for SIGAda ESC-West booth

Volunteers sought for SIGAda ESC-West booth

Ann Brandon

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:16:35 -0500

18 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager