LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  July 2000

TEAM-ADA July 2000

Subject:

Re: The Pocket PC - a platform where Ada *should* have a

From:

Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:01:02 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (178 lines)

Robin et al,
>
> At 11:18 AM 7/27/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >Rick et al,
> >
> >Since this thread is really not going away, I'm going to shift gears
>
> I don't see this as a continuation of any previous thread (except maybe
> the promotion of Ada on M$ platforms which, I can't see why any legitimate
> promotion of Ada is unwanted).

I agree, but enough is enough. Singing the same song over and over
is asking people to stick their fingers in their ears.
>
> >and try to put it in perspective. Rick, it is simply not clear to me
> >just what you're trying to accomplish.
>
> It seems he is trying to create awareness of emerging areas where he thinks
> that Ada should have an impact?

Yes, but

(1) he said that first many days ago;
(2) it's nowhere near the first time we've had this general discussion
    in this forum.
>
>
> >- Raising our consciousness about Microsoft's importance in the world?
> >
> >   I doubt anyone in this group was unaware of it before you wrote.
> >
> >- Trying to get more of us to write Ada applications against
> >   Windows interfaces?
> >
> >   Lots of us are already doing that, and I doubt this discussion
> >   has served to recruit many more.
>
> At least he is trying... Many of us (myself included) are too busy with
> what we are doing to actively promote Ada. I'd rather see someone try
> and fail then not to try at all.

But Rick is preaching to the choir here. I figure most of us who are
interested in developing for M$ platforms already know what the
possibilities are, and are already doing what they are interested
in doing. I think it's also fairly likely that the ones doing the
_interesting_ stuff are not going to say much about it here.
>
> >- Convincing us that Microsoft "standards" are standards?
> >
> >   We've beaten it to death - different people define the term
> >   differently?
>
> Beaten and beaten and ...

Thank heaven that one seems to have died...
>
> >- Accomplishing any significant shift of priorities in the Ada
> >   community?
> >
> >   I doubt it, because Ithink you're talking to the wrong people
> >   here. See below.
>
> Even a minor shift in a direction that increases the awareness of Ada
> in a good light, seems to me to be welcome.

I'm trying to figure out exactly how you (and Rick) propose that
this be done. We are all aware of Ada; most of us are aware of
Microsoft. Some of us are already marrying the two.

After nearly 20 years of promoting Ada (inside, but also outside, the
narrow Ada community), I get impatient pretty fast with people coming
to this forum, saying "here's what WE should do". I would much prefer
to see someone say "Here is what _I_ am doing, outside this community,
to promote Ada. Who'd like to join me?" "We" is a meaningless pronoun
when "we" really means "You do it, I'm too busy."
>
>
> >[snip]
> > >
> > > This is definitely a platform on which Ada should have a presence.
> > >
> > > Enjoy the report(s),
> > > Rick
> >
> >Well, if you think so,
>
> You don't? I think the more platforms the better. Even the ones that we
> personally don't care for.

I didn't say I didn't. I agree with Rick, and with you. I meant only
that if Rick _really_ thinks so, he'll use his time better to work
behind the scenes to really make it happen. Rick has been around
the Ada community for a long time and knows who the players are.
>
> >- as a person who seems to be trying to
> >bridge the gap between the Ada community and Microsoft - seem to be
> >in a good position to establish some contacts on both sides. An
>
> I thought that's what he's doing?

Did I miss where Rick reported on a successful Ada-Microsoft marriage
he arranged? As I said, Rick knows who the Ada players are, and (I'm
guessing here) probably knows who the Microsoft players are.
What's going to happen in _this_ forum?
>
> >endless thread on Team-Ada seems to me to be one of the _least_
> >effective ways to get this done. A more effective way by far is
> >to work behind the scenes as a "marriage broker". I have a good
>
> It seems to me that working "behind the scenes" is only part of the
> work. There has to be some work "In front of the scenes" if the people
> behind the scenes are going to do anything.

Not in my experience. First accomplish something behind the scenes.
THen work quietly to build a bigger group behind the scenes. Then
when you really have something to say, go public. Otherwise it's
just theoretical, yet another "Here's an opportunity for Ada...
you guys go do something with it."
>
> >bit of experience trying to make "marriages" between Ada vendors
> >and the academic community. Not all my efforts succeeded, but not
> >all my efforts failed either.
> >
> >Rick, have you tried working behind the scenes to make connections
> >between the relevant Microsoft folks and the Ada vendor companies
> >?
> >The decision-makers on both sides are - we can be pretty sure - not
> >likely to be readers of Team-Ada!
>
> Really? Any Ada vendors out there? Maybe not the decision makers themselves
> but at least some of the engineers and CS personnel that have their ears?

Do you seriously think they don;t know about the various possibilities
in Microsoft-land? I have no inside track to the vendors, but I've seen
enough of what they do to conjecture that they know quite well what
the _possibilities_ are, and are frustrating us mostly because they've
chosen to go after the ones they think will make them money.

Their attitude is sometimes frustrating for sure, but they are on the
inside, not I, and more than 15 years of dealing with them has taught
me the futility of telling them how to make their business decisions.:-)

If Rick or anyone else thinks they are on to a serious opportunity
the vendors have missed, I cannot believe they'll accomplish more
in an open e-mail chat group like this than they would by sending
a few strategic private mails or making a few key phone calls.

We all know who the vendors are who are likely to support new platforms.
If you think you can make the case for doing so profitably, and think
they're missing the boat, let them know. It ain't gonna happen in
this forum.
>
> Lately it seems this list has become a M$ bashing platform instead of an
> Ada discussion/promotion list. I don't particularly like M$ either (I run
> FreeBSD on my home machine and have sworn-off Outlook at work) but the
> reality is that M$ has a major impact (good or bad) in any market they enter.

No question about it.

The only M$ "bashing" I did was to try to clarify what we all meant
by "standards", and to tell a war story about IBM, nearly 35 years ago,
signing, and following, a consent decree that has been profitable both
for IBM and for their competition. If Microsoft had settled some
very similar antitrust issues as effectively as IBM did, the world
would look a lot different now.

> Lets try to get back to the business of promoting Ada!

I agree - on Team-Ada we are all preaching to the choir. Let's work on
the outside to make our congregation bigger. When someone reports
real progress (here or elsewhere), I'll be delighted to join the
cheering section.
>
> Robin Reagan
> [log in to unmask]       http://www.reagans.org/
>            _
Mike Feldman

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager