LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  August 2000

TEAM-ADA August 2000

Subject:

Re: The Pocket PC - a platform where Ada *should* have a presence

From:

Ada Marketing <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 1 Aug 2000 16:59:37 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (148 lines)

Group,

Beard, Frank wrote:
>
> Rick,
>
> I'm not sure if David Wood was talking about Aonix or not (oops,
> did I say that out loud), because I'm curious as to why they aren't
> part of this list, or haven't responded.
>
> Have you tried working with, or contacting, any of their people?
>
> http://www.aonix.com
>
> They have a pretty decent MS Windows development environment,
> including a GUI builder (ObjectAda for Windows), and are probably
> in the best position, of commercial vendors, to integrate in with
> current/new MS technologies.  It seems like a short step for them to
> move their current product from one MS platform to another.  Of
> course, it always looks easier to those who aren't the ones having

That is the issue.  However we will be looking closely at this for the next
major release of ObjectAda for Windows.  7.2 came out in March.  We released the
first patch update a week or so back.  7.2.1 is scheduled to be complete and
released from engineering towards the end of this year.  Shipping is likely
around the end of January (as of today's schedules).  We have planned
maintenance releases every 6 months after a major release.  These are scheduled
for all products through Sept. 2001.  The goal is a minor release every 6 months
and a new major release once a year.  Integration with MS developer studio would
be looked into for the next major release.


> to make it work.  Ed Falis mentioned in an earlier e-mail that they did
> some early porting to WinCE 2.0.

Yes Ed did look at this and it appeared to be a minor effort to support it.
However, what is the market for CE?  Certainly MS thinks a lot of it.  But the
major embedded development community is much more interested in VxWorks, LynxOS,
then Linux before looking at WinCE.  If someone has a large program considering
Ada95 on CE I'd like to here about it.  So far we have only had tire kickers.


>
> Dave Wood, or Ed Falis, could probably give you the name of a
> good contact at Aonix.

That would be me.  I am listening, but didn't have too much to contribute.  Plus
I was on travel all last week (Sunday to Saturday).  On travel 4 out of the past
days the week before.  Out yesterday and on travel again tomorrow.  Thus I did
not have the time for any lengthy response.

As for supporting Pocket PCs...  I do think Ada is one of the best languages
available.  It certainly is a viable (if not the best) for embedded computing.
However it is a bit large.  Thus it's use on a Pocket PC is unknown in my mind.

What is the group consensus on it's use in this environment?


>
> Frank
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Conn [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 4:03 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: The Pocket PC - a platform where Ada *should* have a
> > presence
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > As I said before, it's important to recognize and state the problem first.
> > You are looking for solutions, but they don't come so easily in most
> > cases.
> > However, in this case, a solution is fairly obvious ... for us to become
> > more involved in these activities.
> >
> > At Tech Ed 2000, there were 300 vendors, and none of them mentioned Ada
> > (that I saw).  11,000 attendees, 300 vendors, and months of visibility
> > afterwards thru post-conference messages and CDROMs.  Of the vendors (IBM,
> > Compaq, Dell, HP, Construx, etc.), Rational Software Corporation did have
> > a booth, touting themselves as an e-Commerce solution provider.  It seems
> > there could have been at least one Ada compiler vendor with Ada compilers
> > for Windows in a shrink-wrap package.
> >
> > Rick
> > ====================================
> > Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
> > Reuse Tapestry
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Feldman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 11:29 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Cc: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: The Pocket PC - a platform where Ada *should* have a
> > presence
> >
> >
> > [said Rick]
> > >
> > > Several people on this list have expressed an intolerance to Microsoft
> > > (perhaps there is an analogy here again to those people conquered by
> > > ancient Rome), but, unlike ancient Rome, we can better our position
> > > by working with Microsoft rather than turning our backs on them.
> > > We as a community are divided enough without drawing lines based
> > > on one company.
> >
> > I couldn't agree more. But I'm still waiting to see some specific,
> > constructive, suggestions for how we can actually do this. Do you
> > have some, Rick?
> >
> > > It's not a single individual who can hold back the "Ada community"
> > > -- but intolerance, a lack of being willing to listen to other ideas,
> > > and a community culture that is not actively following technology
> > > advancements and trends can hold us back and eventually kill us.
> >
> > I've followed this thread and think you are exaggerating. It is not
> > intolerant, but simply a statement of reality, that Microsoft tries
> > to impose its ways on everyone in the industry. Being honest about
> > this is, IMHO, the best way to live with it and try to leverage on it.
> >
> > Some in this group will want to do this leveraging, others not, but
> > you are badly mistaken to tar everyone with the same brush.
> >
> > It is also a distortion to say this community is not "actively
> > following technology advancements and trends". Undoubtedly some
> > are more steeped in Microsoft details than others, but your broad
> > assertion that the "community" (whatever that is) is ignorant of
> > the current state of technology (even of Microsoft technology
> > specifically) is groundless, and verges on insulting our (collective)
> > intelligence and experience. This is not an effective way to
> > get action, Rick.
> >
> > It would be far better to state, concisely and constructively,
> > just what your proposed solutions are, and indicate the extent
> > to which you will participate along with any other "takers".
> >
> > > Rick
> >
> > Mike Feldman

--

Greg Gicca
Aonix Ada Marketing account
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager