LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  August 2000

TEAM-ADA August 2000

Subject:

Re: Ada Letters Dead Lines (was Re: aJile's Java chip (was Re:

From:

Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:57:10 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (235 lines)

[said David]
> > As for the SIGAda talk, specifically which talk?
> > Have you contacted the
> > speaker to bring him or her up to date?
>
> The speaker was aware, but it is unimportant. I was
> only pointing out that I find in the small community
> we have that there is small effort to bring together
> the scarce resources we have and that there seems to
> be reluctance on the acceptance of _new_ things in to
> the camp.

I don't think it's reluctance as much as it is, simply,
not focusing on it. I've been in this community a long
time and find mostly that people are busy and can only
spend X much time on "volunteer work".

> If I was burning up from the incident, I
> certainly would have said something at least privately
> to that individual (I've never been called shy).

OK.
>
> > AdaPower is a great website, but I don't remember
> > David's asking
> > anyone's permission to set up yet another site
>
> Actually, I did ask. Before I created AdaPower (or at
> that time the Ada Source Code Treasury), I first
> posted messages on comp.lang.ada about it (no one
> directed me to Team-Ada to ask there also, and I was
> still new to the scene). EVERY step of AdaPower's
> growth has been directly through community involvement
> and requested or perceived need.

I was sort of kidding about the permission thing. But perhaps
you realize now that there are many Ada fans (myself included)
who don't (anymore) include c.l.a. on their reading list.
>
> > instead of building
> > it as a section of (say) SIGAda, which already has a
> > large site at
> > ACM and would, I'm sure, have hosted this one. I
> > think the same goes
> > for AdaIC/ARA.
>
> My idea, and yours as expressed to me once in an
> e-mail (funny you should use this argument here), is
> that there should be many different Ada sites. I have
> always believed that having additional _functioning_
> Ada web sites gives a larger impression of our
> community living and growing (AdaHome has been dead
> for many years now and a site to take its place in the
> eye of the public was very badly needed, thus The Ada
> Source Code Treasury became AdaPower). AdaPower was
> born from need and with much discussion. Mostly on
> comp.lang.ada, although some things have been born out
> from the Team-Ada list, and now frequently from its
> various chat boards and e-mail lists.

I quite agree. I have no problem with their being lots of
sites, and couldn't prevent it even if I wanted to. But it's
just unrealistic to expect everyone to know about everything,
so you (and Tom Moran, for example) have to be a bit patient
and not too quick to complain about "balkanization". We cannot
have it both ways: if we are going to be decentralized, we
can't complain too much about not seeing every site mentioned
on every other site or in every news article or in every
conference talk.

I don't believe anyone is trying to freeze out AdaPower
or any other resources; I just think not everyone knows about
everything.

(If you think there's anything more deliberate than that out
there, let's discuss that on the side.)
>
> > SIGAda and ARA are the two biggest Ada organizations
> > (at least in the
> > US), but obviously cannot (and probably should not)
> > prevent others
> > from setting up their own websites.
>
> Unlike AdaPower, I never saw advertisements on the
> SigAda site for people to set up shop their own sites
> and services. Perhaps if I had in those days seen such
> an advertisement, I would have considered it. Neither
> site has ever to my knowledge tried to prevent others
> from creating websites, but neither have they
> encouraged it or supported it.

Well, SIGAda is a membership organization that's built around
Working Groups (WGs). The website is organized that way. I
think if any group had proposed (for example) a Linux WG to the
elected board, it probably would have been accepted (still
would, I think).

It's true that SIGAda does carry an annual dues, which
is $25/year, not a horrible amount. It _used_ to be true that
one had to join ACM to join a SIG, and enough people complained
about that policy that ACM changed it.
>
> I am hardly a rebel. I am and have been a member of
> SigAda (and ACM for that matter) and certainly
> encourage others to join. I wouldn't be doing
> tutorials and a talk for bubkis if not my belief in
> strengthening the organization and community as a
> whole.

Hey, I didn't mean to offend or imply that you weren't doing
your part - you and AdaPower have made a big contribution to
the community. But just as there were things you didn't know
about SIGAda, there are people in SIGAda who might not hang out
on the net and do not know about you.
>
> AdaPower is not an organization. It is a resource for
> Ada Developers. It is an important complement to
> SigAda and I doubt any one would like to see it go
> away soon.

I agree.
>
> > Anyway, let's all try to publicize the resources we
> > have as widely
> > as we can. That's the most that can be expected.
>
> Exactly and all that is expected :-)
>
> > Nobody is in charge
> > of this community; I don't think we'd want it any
> > other way. (In a
> > sense, the government used to think it was "in
> > charge" of Ada - did
> > that help?)
>
> In charge no, but I would like to see SigAda take more
> of a leadership role in not just advertising Ada to
> the out side world, but with in the Ada community
> (on-line and off). There are many great public Ada
> projects going on, a little time spent seeing who are
> the movers and shakers (ie. the future) and recruiting
> them and their ideas would be time well spent. Things
> are changing and it would be good for SigAda to be on
> top of it.

Well, keep in mind that SIGAda may be an organization, in name,
but it is really just a bunch of volunteers. Nobody gets paid
a dime, and the most we get from our employers is some time
to go to conferences. So when you say "SIGAda should...", it
would help if you tried to suggest a mechanism for this to happen.
SIGAda is not a "thing", it's just a bunch of people. The union
of all our knowledge is probably all of Ada and its world,
but we cannot expect everyone to know everything.

Much of the discussion you desire goes on at the annual conference.
We netheads may think it all ought to happen here on the net,
but not everyone agrees or feels like spending as much time
online as we do.

BTW - SIGAda has four sources of income:

- annual dues - at $25. apiece this doesn't go very far, as a lot
  just goes into publishing AdaLetters, which members still seem
  to like in paper form.

- income from the conference - a SIGAda conference is not LinuxWorld.
  There's a little surplus, but not a whole lot.

- a few institutional sponsors - see the inside cover of AdaLetters.

- a small amount of funding from ARA.

This is not a high-profit operation - it really does depend on
volunteers.
>
> Being relatively new to SigAda and SigAda '99, I spent
> most of my time observing how things worked. I admit
> that I am still in the dark about SigAda operations
> and organization even after being a member for two
> years now.

Well, the organization (officers, WGs) is laid out on the
SIGAda website, linked from "SIGAda Organizational
Information." All the officers, etc., are given there.

http://www.acm.org/sigada

> Basic stuff, like when are elections held,

Good question - I never remember this myself...

I think it would be a good idea to post the SIG by-laws on the
web. I'll pass this idea on, or you can do it.

> general meetings, how do workgroups work and operate.

Each WG has its own culture. Some are quite active, others quiet,
others exist in name only.

> None of this is up on the SigAda web site.

Are you sure? I just checked the site and found quite a lot of
info. Obviously there is never enough info, and there are always
good ideas for more, but what's there is a pretty good start
and saying "none" is going too far.

> I am
> certainly willing to work at improving things as much
> in the organization as I have out of the organization.
> Is there a list where SigAda discussions take place? I
> certainly would have joined it long ago.

On the website is a list of 23 mailing lists associated with
the SIG, including sigada-talk and team-ada. Interestingly,
I forgot about sigada-talk myself. Subscription info is
given on that page of the site.

THe general attitude has been that as an ACM group, we should
try to use ACM services where possible. I wish ACM focused on
having the most up-to-date list services, but they still use
listserv so there's no web interface.

(Don't get me started on ACM's IT services; this is a case of
the shoemaker's children going barefoot.)

SIGAda does have an open business meeting (forum, whatever) each
year at the conference. That's small consolation for those
who don't or can't go to the meetings. Some of the officers
read team-ada and c.l.a., but not all. They're friendly people,
though, and their e-mail addresses are given on the website.

> David Botton
>
Mike Feldman

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager