LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  February 2001

TEAM-ADA February 2001

Subject:

Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!

From:

"Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.

Date:

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:54:05 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

From: Bob Leif
To: Prof. Michael Feldman et al.

"Allchin said he's concerned that the open-source business model could
stifle initiative in the computer industry."

I might agree on the "Free Software" model. However, Microsoft is vulnerable
to open-source, which is the next step in the evolution of commercial
software development. As I have published, open-source provides significant
benefits to the vendor:


Benefits to the Vendors:
1. The customer already has, by custom, the Ada specifications, which often
include the private section. Together, these can provide significant insight
into the design and organization of the packages. Therefore, significant
information concerning the design has already been released to the customer.

2. Part of the vendor's responsibility for usability is transferred to the
customer, who can review the contents of the packages and can create and
perform white box (source code based) tests.

3. The customer will review the packages.
a) which will often result in an improvement in the documentation and/or
design in response to a request for an explanation of part of the source,
b) discovery of errors and suggestions on how to fix the problem,
c) or better yet, the customer supplies a patch to fix the problem.

4. Changes in compiler library formats will not require the developers to
recompile their packages.
a) The difficulty of managing compiled Ada '83 libraries was one of the main
sources of the negative image of Ada.
b) Source is relatively compact compared with compiled libraries and can be
shipped via the Internet.

5. The open source requirement protects against the copying of libraries.
Visual or computer comparison of two libraries supplied as open source
should permit detection of common elements. Effective copyright protection
requires that competitors publish their sources. Competitors who keep their
sources secret will have a very significant competitive disadvantage against
those who provide open source.

R. C. Leif, “SIGAda ‘98, Workshop: How do We Expedite the Commercial Use of
Ada?.” Ada letters XIX, No 1 pp. 28-39 (1999).

If "Linux is now capturing a 27% market share in installed units of servers
OSes", what would happen if an equivalent highly reliable, efficient Ada
product competed in this market?

Actually, Microsoft has never used the honest truth as its defense against
the antitrust. Its competitors have been technologically stupid and, except
for Sun, have done more to assure Microsoft's dominance than Microsoft! If
any one of Microsoft's competitors had used Ada, they could have developed a
reliable, well designed product, which would have vanquished Microsoft in
the market place. As has been demonstrated by the Java craze, Sun has
remarkably good marketing ability.
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Michael Feldman
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: microsoft lobbies gov't to control open source!


[said Jim Hopper]
>
>   Just when you thought MS couldnt do anything more outrageous they do
this!
> ...
>
> http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html
>
>    2/14/01 4:57 PM
>    Source:Bloomberg News
>
>    Redmond, Washington, Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp.'s
> Windows operating-system chief, Jim Allchin, says that freely
> distributed software code
>    such as rival Linux could stifle innovation and that legislators
> need to understand the threat.
>
>    The result will be the demise of both intellectual property rights
> and the incentive to spend on research and development, he said
> yesterday, after the
>    company previewed its latest version of Windows. Microsoft has told
> U.S. lawmakers of its concern while discussing protection of
> intellectual property
>    rights.

This is a bit off-topic for Ada, but...

There is no limit to Microsoft's arrogance. The same article discusses
Microsoft's $135 million investment in Corel (!) and mentions that Corel
has stopped being a contributor to Linux development. Linux is now
capturing a 27% market share in installed units of servers OSes.
No wonder Microsoft is worried.

BTW - I did hear on the radio yesterday that the US Justice Dept
is looking at the antitrust implications of M$'s big purchase of
Corel stock. Looks like even with George W. and John Ashcroft in
power, they can still recognize a company trying to buy up a
competitor.

  * * * * *

GNAT fans will just love this quote from the article:

<quote>

Allchin said he's concerned that the open-source business model could
stifle initiative in the computer industry.

''I'm an American, I believe in the American Way,'' he said. ''I worry
if the government encourages open source, and I don't think we've done
enough education of policy makers to understand the threat.''

</quote>

  * * * * *

So now open-source folks are un-American, eh? Well, after all,
Linux was invented by some *&^% foreigner, wasn't it? He was
even rumored to be <gasp> Scandinavian! Isn't that the part of the
world where all the dirty movies come from? No wonder they're
out to undermine the American Way!

Proud as ever to be an unpatriotic spineless tekkie pinko,

I remain yours faithfully,

Mike Feldman

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager