LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  February 2001

TEAM-ADA February 2001

Subject:

Re: The Good and Bad News about Java

From:

"S. Ron Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

S. Ron Oliver

Date:

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:30:41 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (123 lines)

At 09:02 AM 2/20/01 -0600, Johnson Phillip E wrote:

> >Perhaps, but I think what I'm really saying is that "techies", with the
> >bent you ascribe to them, are not the right people to be trusted with doing
> >software development of any kind that has any impact on the society at
> >large.  This is where we (especially us academics) have really screwed
> >up.  "Our" model of what software developers are is very blue-collar.  A
> >white collar, truly professional model, more like that for doctors and
> >lawyers, is much more appropriate.
>
>Ron appears to believe the ONLY true professional in the industry is a
>semi-retired professor of Computer Science and Computer Engineering.

Quite the contrary.  In my software sucks! lecture I outline a proposed
means of achieving Professionalism in the field of software
development.  (Read on.)


>It is my observation that the academics believe that Engineers, Computer
>Scientist,
>Software Engineers, et. al. are "professionals" and not technicians.

Well.  I don't even believe that most "academics" in any of these fields
are "professional".

>While working in the computer field as a field engineer and a software
>developer for 30
>years, I observed the same mistakes being made over and over again by new
>graduates.

My expectation is that "new graduates" (especially during the past 25 years
or so, and the more recent the more likely) would make "the same" mistakes
much more often, and would likely make "new mistakes" that people who
entered the software development industry 30 years ago would most likely avoid.

>They were following what they had been taught.

Exactly.  And "what they were being taught", for the most part was, at
best, irrelevant, and often of negative value.

>I recommended to several department chairs that both schools of
>Engineering and Computer Science should require a one year internship
>prior to graduation.

Interesting.  My own proposal is similar to this.  My proposal is that
prospective software developers should get a REAL degree in Math, Science,
and/or Engineering (preferably all three), THEN do (at least) a one year
internship.  I tend to think it would be better if it were 1 1/2 years or
longer.

>The unanimous response was, "We are graduating professionals not technicians."

Well, what can I say.  You were talking to the wrong people.


> >Blue-collar "professionals", understandably, require considerable
> >government intervention.  White-collar professionals, at worst, guide the
> >government in setting standards of conduct and practice.
>
>"understandably"
>
>This is an ego-centric attitude at best.  I have seen "Blue-Collar"
>professionals that more professional than any "white-collar" and adhere to
>"standards and practices" with little or no oversight.

I have seen this too.  But (well, let's not get into that just now . . .)

My use of the term "Blue-Collar" is intended to characterize someone in a
career that demands LESS than a 4-year college degree.  (And that is
precisely what almost all Computer Science majors get these days.)

By contrast, I would expect "White-Collar" would denote someone with
significantly MORE than a 4 year degree.  (Don't ask me what color collar
those in the middle wear.  I'm not sure.  Checkered? :)

Of course, a "4 year degree, plus", in itself, is not sufficient.  The
course of study must be relevant.

>I have seen "white-collars" that thought they were so superior that they
>did not
>understand why they were fired for do getting the product out (over and
>over).

So have I.  They simply aren't wearing the correct "brand" of white collar.

>The fact is the individual not the group define the work ethic of a
>professional.

Most professional disciplines have very carefully written codes of
ethics.  The role of the individual is to apply that code of ethics
conscientiously, not to write his own.

Interestingly enough, "we" (Computing Professionals) have at least two such
codes of ethics - one produced by ACM, one by IEEE - how many contemporary
software developers even know they exist, let alone have read them?


>Ron tends to paint his pictures with a "very" broad brush,

I hope you now see a little more of the detail.

>when the actual world does not live in his Ivory tower.

By "actual world" I suppose you mean the overwhelming majority of "current
working environments for software developers".  I haven't a clue what you
mean by "Ivory tower".  However, if my interpretation of "actual world" is
even close, I would say they do not "live by" anything remotely close to
professionalism, by any reasonable understanding of the term
"professional".  The evidence is clear.  Look at all that sucky software
and the almost total absence of quality software.  :)

sro

S. Ron Oliver, semi-retired professor of Computer Science and Computer
Engineering.  www.csc.calpoly.edu/~sroliver

caress Corporation is proud to be the U.S. representative for Top Graph'X,
developers of high quality software components, using Ada.  For more
information, check out www.topgraphx.com.

Tired of sucky software! ?  Check out www.caressCorp.com and follow the
links to software sucks and The Oliver Academy.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager