LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  December 2002

TEAM-ADA December 2002

Subject:

Re: CS grads (was Re: Future of Ada)

From:

"Luke(Lujun) Zhang" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Luke(Lujun) Zhang

Date:

Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:27:25 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (126 lines)

Well, if a student starts with a code-focus course
first. Then the following courses will not easily
eliminate the preconception already existing in his
brain.

The first language course can be Java, not necessary
Ada. Especially in these days, Java is better than Ada
for those students seeking jobs. But the teaching
should be engineering-focus, not code-focus. When I
first began research on Ada in 1995, I thought C++ is
better than Ada since I had used C++ for two years and
C++ has so many "Ugly"(from engineering aspect)
tricks. It took me nearly two years to switch to an
Ada fan and an engineering guy.

It is not easy to find the difference between
code-focus and engineering-focus students when they
are still at schools. But when they start their jobs,
the difference will be huge. So we can't simply use
the performance at school to testify the success of a
transfer from Ada to Java as the intro course.

Luke Zhang

--- Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Well, one hopes that the students who survive those
> new intro courses
> are the better ones, so you can shape them up in the
> upper-level
> courses.
>
> We can (and do) debate endlessly what to teach, in
> what part of the
> curriculum. Obviously Ada-first folks emphasize
> quality from the get-go,
> but we have 4 years to educate the students, and if
> the intro folks
> (and the high-school APCS teachers!) insist on
> teaching mostly code,
> we still have a chance to improve the situation in
> the later courses.
>
> Time for an admission: this year, we changed our
> intro courses from
> Ada to Java. I saw the change was inevitable for a
> number of reasons.
> So rather than resist it, I got out in front of it,
> proposed it myself,
> and kept control of the intro courses. Currently,
> I'm teaching a
> freshman course that focuses on quality - it's the
> same course I've
> taught for years, just using a different coding
> language.
>
> Yeah, I miss Ada and think the switch was too bad,
> but it had to
> happen. On the other hand, I'm doing my damndest to
> make sure the
> emphasis on quality doesn't suffer.
>
> So far the news is pretty good. The course is just
> about over.
> We started with about 40 students, of whom most are
> first-semester
> freshmen. A few weak students are repeating, and a
> few are
> transferring into CS beyond their first year.
> Roughly half have
> zero prior programming experience.
>
> Overall, this is the best freshman group I've seen
> in a long time,
> maybe the best ever. As was the case with the Ada
> version of the
> course, both the experienced (from high school) and
> the novice
> students are hitting the same grade curve. Two
> students quit the
> course in the 2nd week; they decided early that CS
> wasn't their
> cuppa tea. The weak students are still weak. Other
> than that,
> my grades are going to be quite high, and I know of
> at least
> 32 who are continuing into the second course, which
> I will
> teach in the spring.
>
> None of my nearly-20 colleagues have complained
> about my approach
> to the intro courses; they're happy about the switch
> to Java but
> have no problems with my quality-first approach.
>
> Interestingly enough, several students who did
> C++-based courses
> in high school told me that with no prodding or
> suggestion from
> me, they sent the course URL to their high school CS
> teachers,
> as an example of how an intro course ought to be
> done. Naturally,
> that made my day.:-)
>
> If anyone is curious, you can compare the Ada and
> Java versions
> of the course. For info on the Ada one, see
>
> http://www.seas.gwu.edu/~csci51
>
> and for the new Java one, see
>
> http://www.seas.gwu.edu/~csci53
> >
> > John
> >
> Mike Feldman


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager