Wojtek Narczynski wrote:
> But IMHO the whole UML is "The Emperorís New Suit" (by Hans Christian
> Andersen), if you know what I mean.
I don't know if I'd go that far. UML is primarily a requirements
notation, and does not seem to me as well suited for design as for
requirements. It also has a lot of diagrams, each of which adds only a
little information. The reader has to understand each of those many
diagrams and integrate them in his head to understand the system. I
would much prefer a notation with fewer diagrams, each of which conveys
"Whatever it is, I'm against it."