Bruce Hennessy <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Although I would agree that Ada makes it easy to partition code and hence
> responsibilities, I would also say that diagramming in UML, or Booch etc.,
> is a necessary thing to do in order to model the system you are building
> before writing package specs. Of course this depends on the complexity level
> of what you are building.
I have never understood why people feel "diagramming" is better than
writing Ada specs.
I understand writing very high level context diagrams, and even first
level data flows.
Beyond that, Ada is a better tool for discussing the details.
> Forget about having a pissing contest on which diagram technique to
> use; the thing with UML is that it is a global standard, hence a
> language that all developers can use to communicate design ideas.
Ada is also a "global standard". I suspect you mean "more people know
UML than other diagramming languages".
> The important thing is to utilize the diagrams to develop a design.
I agree, but I don't see the value in using diagrams for more detail
than top level data flows.