LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  August 2004

TEAM-ADA August 2004

Subject:

EuroSPI 2004 Advance Conference Program

From:

ISCN Eurospi Mail <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ISCN Eurospi Mail <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:49:41 +0200

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (658 lines)

If you want to be deleted from the mailing list, please send an email with
subject DELETE to: [log in to unmask] . We are a serious European initiative
established since 1994 and will delete your email immediately.

             ***************************
             * EuroSPI 2004 Conference *
             ***************************

         European Software Process Improvement

10.-12. November 2004, Trondheim, Radisson SAS Hotel, Norway

        http://2004.eurospi.net     Conference Web Site
        http://www.eurospi.net      Initiative Web Site
        http://library.eurospi.net  European Experience Library


EuroSPI represents a European experience forum collaborating
with nearly all SPINs in Europe. EuroSPI offers experiences which
can be re-used creating benefits in your own organisation .

The Norwegian Technical University (NTNU) is this year's major sponsor and
they organise a workshop "Improving Global SW Development" as an
associated workshop.
http://www.idi.ntnu.no/prosjekt/igsd2004/

1. Key Notes
   - Scott Ambler, Ronin International Inc, CA
   - Alec Dorling, ISOSPICE, UK
2. Conference Program (11-12 Nov 2004)
   - Research Sessions
   - Industry Experience Sessions
3. Tutorials (10 Nov 2004)
4. Associated Workshops (10 Nov 2004)
   - Improving Global Software Development
   - SPI for Safety Critical and Business Critical Systems
5. Associated Training/Certificates
   - INTACS Certified ISO 15504 Assessor (6 - 10 Nov 2004)
   - CMMI Introduction Course (7-9 Nov 2004)
6. Sponsors & Partnership
7. In case of interest


1. Key Notes
============

SPI and Agile Model Driven Development

by Scott Ambler, Ronin International Inc, CA

Scott Ambler is a Senior Consultant with  Ronin International, Inc. since
its inception in 1999.  He actively works with Ronin clients on
large-scale software development projects and on software process
improvement (SPI) efforts around the world.
Scott is Canadian and still lives in Canada although he spends a large
portion of his time consulting in the United States and Europe.  He has
worked in the IT industry since the mid 1980s and with object technology
since the early 1990s. He has written several books and white papers on
object-oriented software development, software process, Agile Model Driven
Development (AMDD), Agile Database Techniques, and the Enterprise Unified
Process (EUP).

The ISO 15504 Standard and Current Initiatives

by Alec Dorling, ISOSPICE, UK

Alec Dorling is an internationally recognized expert in the field of
Software Quality Management, Process Assessment and Improvement. He has
held key posts at international research institutes that include the
Centre for Software Engineering in Sweden, the European Software Institute
in Spain and the National Computing Centre in the UK. He is a chartered
engineer with over 30 years experience in the IT industry gained both in
real-time and commercial systems environments. He has been involved with
most of the key UK government's initiatives in software engineering and
software quality. Alec Dorling is the international project leader of the
SPICE
(Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination) project and
convener of the ISO group developing ISO/IEC 15504. He is currently
actively involved in leading world-wide assessments of suppliers in the
Space and Automotive sectors.

Alec is also a Director of The Procurement Forum and is involved in key
European projects in IT procurement process assessment, best practice,
benchmarking and improvement.  During the last four years Alec has been
the project leader of the European PULSE and PROBE IT procurement process
assessment, benchmarking and improvement projects and has
participated in the procurement best practice projects ASSIST and
VALIDATE.


2. Conference Program
=====================

EuroSPI 2004 offers a 4 track conference with a mixture of research and
industrial presentations. An OPEN SPACE runs in parallel to the conference
and offers a place to meet, present, and discuss.

11 November 2004
----------------

08.00-09.00 Registration

09.00-10.00 Key Note 1 : Scott Ambler

10.00-10.30 Break

10.30-12.00 Research	Research	Research
            Session 1A	Session 1B	Session 1C

12.00-13.00 Lunch

13.00-14.30 Industry 	Industry	Industry	Industry
            Session 1A	Session 1B	Session 1C	Session 1D

14.30-15.00 Break

15.00-16.30 Industry 	Industry	Industry	Industry
            Session 2A	Session 2B	Session 2C	Session 2D


19.00-21.00 Conference Social Event and Dinner

12 November 2004
----------------

09.00-10.00 Key Note 2 : Alec Dorling

10.00-10.30 Break

10.30-12.00 Research	Research	Research
            Session 2A	Session 2B	Session 2C

12.00-13.00 Lunch

13.00-14.30 Industry 	Industry	Industry	Industry
            Session 3A	Session 3A	Session 3A	Session 3A

14.30-15.00 Break

15.00-15.30 Conference Closure

Research Sessions
-----------------

Research Session 1A Global SW Development
*****************************************

On-Site Customer in an XP Project: Empirical Results from a Case Study J.
Koskela, P. Abrahamsson, VTT, FIN

Extreme Programming: Reassessing the Requirements Management
Process for an Offsite Customer
M. Korkala, Univ. of Oulu, P. Abrahamsson, VTT, FIN

Global Software Development Project Management – Distance Overcoming D.
Smite, Riga IT Institute, LV

Research Session 1B SPI Techniques I
************************************

Towards Comprehensive Experience-based Decision Support
A. Jedlitschka, D. Pfahl, Fraunhofer IESE, D

Discovering the Relation between Project Factors
and Project Success in Post-Mortem Project Reviews
J. Schalken, H. v. Vliet, Vrije Univ., S. Brinkkemper,
Univ. of Utrecht, NL

Serious Insights through Fun Software-Projects
D. Lübke, T. Flohr, K. Schneider, University of Hannove


Research Session 1C Studies of SPI
**********************************

SPI in SME Sized Software Enterprises in Eastern Finland:
A State-of-the-Practice Study
I. Saastamoinen, M. Tukiainen, Univ. of Joensuu, FIN

An Experimental Replica to Validate a set of Metrics for Software
Process Models
F. García, F. Ruiz, M. Piattini, ESI, E

Using Measurement Data in a TSP Process-Project
N. Davis, J. Mullaney, CMU, U.S., D.
Carrington, Univ. of Queensland, AUS


Research Session 2A Knowledge Management
****************************************

Software Thinking Improvement: Learning Performance Improving
Lessons
K. Pedersen, Aalborg Univ., DK

The Adoption of an Electronic Process Guide in a Company with
Voluntary Use
N. Brede Moe, T. Dybå, SINTEF, NO

Knowlede Mapping: A Technique for Identifying Knowledge Flows
in Software Organisations
B. Hansen Hansen, K. Kautz, Copenhagen Business School, DK

Research Session 2B SPI Techniques II
*************************************

Determining the Improvement Potential of a Software Development
Organization through Fault Analysis:  Method and Case Study
L. O. Damm, Ericsson,  L. Lundberg, C. Wohlin,
Blekinge Institute of IT, S

RCA and Gap Analysis – A Tale of Two Methods
T. Stålhane, NTNU, NO

Empirical Evaluation of Two Requirements Prioritization Methods
in Product Development Projects
L. Lehtola, M. Kauppinen, Helsinki Univ.of Technology, FIN


Research Session 2C Effort Estimation
*************************************

Project Effort Estimation: Or, When Size Makes a Difference
O. Benediktsson, Univ. of Iceland, IS,
D. Dalcher, Middlesex Univ. , UK

A Comparison of Size Estimation Techniques Applied Early in the
Life Cycle
O. Demirörs, Ç. Gencel, Middle East Techn. University, TR

Development of Model and Process for Timely Progress Reporting in
Use Case Driven Software Development
S. Moon, ComponentBasis, J. Lim, S.  Lee, Sangmzung University, Korea


Industrial Experience Sessions
------------------------------

Industry Session 1-A SPI and Management
***************************************

Project manager’s guide to the Galaxy
N. J. Villmones, Kongsberg Spacetec, NO

ManagEUr - Success Criteria for Distributed Projects
Miklos Biro, BUESPA, HU

Quantitative Project Management: Integration of Balanced Scorecard and
CMMI maturity level 4 P. V. Petersen, Systematic, DK

Industry Session 1-B SPI and Management
****************************************

Recipe for Managing at Level 5
J.Y. Chauviere, Motorola, FR

SPI Managers' Experiences and Opinions on SPI in practice
N. Baddoo, Univ. of Hertfordshire, UK

Evolutionary Project Management: Implementation and experiences
Trond Johansen, FIRM, NO

Industry Session 1-C SPI and RUP
*********************************

Improving The OO Design Process
Javier Garzás,  ALTRAN SDB, M. Piattini, Univ.
of Castilla La Mancha, E

Specializing RUP to defined project types
G. Nordseth, Kantega AS, NO

Tailoring the Unified Process
C. Stensholt, ErgoSolutions, NO

Industry Session 1-D SPI Case Studies
**************************************

Can Dilbert make a difference?
B.I. Nordhus, Kongsberg Spacetec, NO

Beyond Software Process Improvement: A Case Study on Change and
Knowledge Management
J.Pries-Heje, ITU, DK, P. Pourkomeylian, Astrazeneca, DK

The Software Development Culture of Northern Ireland
F. McCaffery, Univ. of Ulster, UK

Industry Session 2-A SPI and Engineering
*****************************************

Proposal for an Integrated Advanced Engineering Process
U. Hehn, Mmethodpark, D

Continuous tailoring activities in software engineering
P. Saliou, Univ. Brest, FR

Merging Agile Development Methodologies - The Case for DSDM
and XP
R. OConnor, DCU, IE

Industry Session 2-B SPI Case Studies
**************************************

User Expectations for an SPI Knowledge Management System
I. Saastamoinen, M. Tukiainen, Univ. of Joensuu, T.Makinen,
T. Varkoi, Tampere  University of Technology, FI

Stages of Software Process Improvement Derived from 10 Year
Case Studies
K. Balla, IQSYS, HU

Evaluation of using a UML methodology in a large embedded development
project K.Hansen, B. Anda, I. Gullesen, H. K., Thorsen, ABB, S

Industry Session 2-C SPI and Organisational Strategies
*******************************************************

Building a learning organisation: experience with establishing
communities of practice
H. Dreiem, Objectnet, NO

Process Improvement is Not Enough - Do not Forget Innovation Processes R.
Messnarz, ISCN GesmbH, A

Prioritizing SPI actions based on business needs and impacts
M. Haavikko, M. Johansson, R. Nevalainen, STTF, FI

Industry Session 2-D SPI and Assessment
****************************************

AXA IT Organisation & Process Maturity Assessment Framework
T. Hind , Axa-Sunlife, UK

Maturity Models as an Assessment Tool
K. O. Jensen, DELTA, DK

Rapid Supplier Capability Evaluation
H. Bush, T. Rollo, U.S.

Industry Session 3-A SPI and Estimation
****************************************

Software Productivity Estimation Based on Association Rules
B. Stamatia, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, GR

Navigating the Minefield: Estimating BEFORE Requirements
C. A. Dekkers, Quality Plus Technologies, U.S.

Productivity and Cost Structures in Software Development Projects
E. Bartus, P. Thorlacius, SIGMA, NO

Industry Session 3-B SPI and Requirements Management
*****************************************************

Developing a RE Process Improvement Model
S. Beecham, T. Hall, A. Rainer, University of Hertfordshire, UK

How Evaluation Techniques Influence the RE-tool Evaluation:
An Experiment
Raimundas Matulevicius, NTNU, NO

Experiences in the Assessment of the Requirement Management Process J.A.
Calvo-Manzano, A. Serrano, Univ. of Madrid, M. Arcilla, UNED, E

Industry Session 3-C SPI and Risk Management
*********************************************

Risk-driven Software Process Improvement
J. Miller, J. Gorski, Univ. of Technology, PL

Increased Value through Reduced Risk in joint industry
/external researcher projects – towards guidelines
L. Bratthall, E. Mikkelsen, DNV, NO

Developing a customer driven decision-making tool for the
selection of software quality models and frameworks
B. Keane, Univ. of Limerick, IE


Industry Session 3-D SPI and Systems
*************************************

Collaborative management for ICT process improvement in SME
B. Direnzo, CPRHT, LU

Patrical Experience of Virtual Team Software Development
V. Casey, Univ. of Limerick, IE

Process improvement through development of an extended electronic process
guide K. R. Nilsen, Kongsberg Spacetec, NO


3. Tutorials
============


EuroSPI 2004 also offers a rich set of associated tutorials
on 10 November 2004.

Morning Tutorials
-----------------

T1 : Agile Development by Scott Ambler
**************************************

Scott is Canadian and still lives in Canada although he spends
a large portion of his time consulting in the United States
and Europe. He has worked in the IT industry since the mid 1980s
and with object technology since the early 1990s.
He has written several books and white papers on object-oriented software
development, software process, Agile Model Driven Development (AMDD),
Agile Database Techniques, and the Enterprise Unified Process (EUP). In
his tutorial Scott will outline how to practically apply AMDD in industry.

T2 - Function Points , UseCases, and SW Quality
***********************************************

Despite the advances in technology and the increased access to
data with data warehouses , one fundamental element of system
development continues to elude us: the logical user requirements.
Done properly, Use Cases clearly document requirements in user
terms in a more complete and articulated manner than other methods.
>From these use cases FP (Function Points) can be utilized
to quantify the size of software based on a structured evaluation
of the logical user requirements. This tutorial will outline how
practitioners can use Use Cases and Function Points to quantify
and control software requirements. This tutorial is
held by Carol Dekkers from Quality Plus Technologies, U.S.

T3 - Introduction to the Team SW Process
****************************************

The Team Software Process (TSP SM) provides a powerful framework for
effective software development. The TSP has helped organisations
developing software systems achieve significant gains in quality and cycle
time. The TSP can be characterised as a methodology that builds
self-directed teams that plan and track their work focusing on quality
rather than schedule. The results from applying the TSP reveal that
schedule improvements are also achieved. The tutorial is held by David
Carrington from the University of Queensland, Australia.

Afternoon Tutorials
-------------------


T4 - Using Agile Approaches to Develop Mobile Applications
**********************************************************

Mobile phone terminals have been closed environments until recent years.
The change brought by open platform technologies such as Symbian operating
system and java-technologies have opened up a significant business
opportunity for anyone to develop application software such as games for
the mobile terminals. Agile development solutions can be seen to provide a
good fit for mobile application development environment. This tutorial
seeks to provide an overview on the special characteristics of mobile
software development and introduce a development approach called MobileD.
The tutorial is held by Pekka Abrahamsson from VTT, Finland.

T5 - SPI and Innovation Management - How Does This Work
*******************************************************

SPI (Software process Improvement) is a structured approach to increase
the capability of processes . In the German automotive industry, for
instance, the target capability level is 3 . However, the innovation
cycles in industry get faster and faster, so that from a business
viewpoint continuous product innovation is needed leading to a
continuous change o frequirements for the established processes. The
tutorial illustrates case studies where this relationship between product
innovation and process improvement has been managed and provides a list of
success criteria. It will demostrate how a group of German companies were
able to establish mutual beneficial task forces to manage such situations.
The tutorial is held by Richard Messnarz from ISCN, Ireland and Austria.


T6 - How to Make Your Complex Distributed Projects a Success
************************************************************

This tutorial discusses success criteria of distributed multinational EU
projects based on trials performed at 59 organisations in 13 countries in
the EU IST-2000-28162 project TEAMWORK. In this project the typical
working processes, the teamwork structures in multinational distributed EU
projects have been analyzed and configured into e-working spaces. These
e-working spaces were then used in the trials. The experiences from these
trials are leveraged in the design of an EU project manager skill card
being developed in the framework of the EU Leonardo da Vinci project
ManagEUr (2003 – 2006). The cases presented in this tutorial will focus on
two of 6 skills units related with (a) Planning and (b) Team Management .
Attendees will be able to receive a certification. The tutorial is held by
Miklos Biro from University of Budapest, and Janos Ivanyos from Memolux,
Hungary.

T7 - Knowledge Based SPI
************************

This tutorial “Knowledge Based SPI” is based on several years research and
development in Finland among FiSMA companies. FiSMA (Finnish Software
Measurement Association) consists of appr. 40 members, and they have used
SPICE, CMMI and related models for years for their own improvement
purposes.FiSMA has developed a system called GNOSIS to support internal
assessments and SPI planning. This tutorial is partially based on
practical cases using GNOSIS system. Participants will learn how a well
defined and tool-supported SPI can be implemented easily. This tutorial is
held by Risto Nevalainen from STTF, Finland.


4. Associated Workshops (10 Nov 2004)
=====================================

Ws1: SPI for Safety Critical and Business Critical Systems
**********************************************************

There are at the present several processes defined for the development of
safety critical systems, e.g. IEC 61508, DO-178B and SAE ARP4761. However,
the idea of SPI has not yet penetrated this important area. At the EuroSPI
workshop we will bring together people who are working with SPI and people
working with the development of safety critical and business critical
systems in order to see what we can achieve together. The participants are
invited to present short papers that will serve as a starting point for
discussions. The focus of the workshop will be on discussions, not on long
presentations. All contributions will be reviewed and all accepted
contributions will be included in a report.

If you plan to actively contribute send a short paper to email:
[log in to unmask]

Ws2 Improving Global Software Development.
*****************************************

Software development is to an increasing extent undertaken in
geographically distributed teams. For example, it is not unusual that
companies choose to outsource a substantial part of their development
activities to low-cost countries, and also a large number of software
products are developed in “open source software” projects that sometimes
are global in scope. Given these trends, this workshop aims at discussing
how SPI efforts should be tackled in global software development. More
accurately, the workshop focuses on illuminating empirically as well as
more theoretically, the various cultural, process-related, and technical
challenges involved when software development goes global.

Send short papers to emails: [log in to unmask] , [log in to unmask]

Paper (max 3 pages) submission deadline      August 15th, 2004 (changed!)
Notification of acceptance                   September 15, 2004
Registration deadline                        October 1, 2004
Workshop date                                November, 10th, 2004


5. Associated Training/Certificates
===================================

INTACS Certified ISO 15504 Assessor
***********************************
(6 Nov 2004 14.00 hours - 10 Nov 2004 14.00 hours)
by R. Messnarz , ISCN, IRL and R. Nevalainen, STTF,FIN

The 5-day SPICE Assessor Training Course is designed specifically for
providing IT professionals with the knowledge and skills needed to conduct
software process assessments according to ISO 15504 - Process Assessment.
The course is INTACS (International Assessor Certification Scheme)
certified. Delegates who demonstrate satisfactory performance throughout
the course and pass the final examination are awarded a Certificate of a
Provisional Assessor . The course already bases on the new ISO 15504
standard (not the TR 15504) which recently came out in 2004. As a result
of attending the course, delegates will be able to navigate the five parts
of ISO 15504,  understand and explain the use of software process
assessment, develop a procedure for conduction 15504-conformant
assessments, assemble and brief an assessment team, plan and conduct
assessments using the assessment model in ISO 15504-5 (based on ISO
12207), and present the results of assessment to the assessed
organisation.
Dr Richard Messnarz has more than 14 years of experience in assessments in
the embedded and automotive sector. He has published a book with IEEE in
1999, he has been a lead consultant and assessor for major German firms,
he is the chairman of EuroSPI, he is a principle/lead assessor in ISO
15504, and he is the  managing director of  ISCN. Dr Risto Nevalainen has
more than 20 years experiences with IT management, he is an experienced
assessor, he coordinates the FisMA initiative in Finland, and he is a
board member of the EuroSPI initiative.

.. the certified ISO 15504 Assessor Course participation fee is  2500
Euro, and if you register for this course you will receive a price
reduction of 200 Euro for the EuroSPI conference.

CMMI Introduction Course (7-9 Nov 2004)
****************************************

K. Johnson, TeraQuest, U.S., C.T. Nielsen, DELTA, DK

This 3-day course introduces systems and software engineering managers,
practitioners, appraisal team members, and engineering process group
(e.g., SEPG, EPG) members to the fundamental concepts of Capability
Maturity Model ® Integration (CMMI ®). The course is composed of lectures
and class exercises and provides ample opportunity for participant
questions and discussions. After attending the course, participants will
be able to understand how CMMI models can apply to their organization's
process improvement program. Additionally, successful completion of this
course is a prerequisite for Intermediate Concepts of CMMI, SCAMPI Lead
Appraiser Training, and CMMI Instructor Training. Kent A. Johnson is the
Director of Systems Engineering for TeraQuest as well as an SEI-certified
Lead Assessor for SW-CMM and a certified SCAMPI Lead Appraiser for CMMI.
Kent's background includes over 25 years experience .
Claus Trebbien Nielsen is the CMMI Programme Manager at DELTA, he is a
member of the CMMI stakeholder group, and he has extensive assessment
experience as BOOTSTRAP and CMMI assessor.

... the CMMI Introduction Course participation fee is  2700 Euro, and if
you register for this course you will receive a price reduction of 200
Euro for the EuroSPI conference.

6. Sponsors & Partnership
=========================

The Norwegian Technical University (NTNU) is sponsoring EuroSPI with
significant funds which allow to finance a world wide recognised expert
for agile methods , Scott Ambler. He is a leading expert in AMDD (Agile
Model Driven Development) and has published numerous books in the field.
Also NTNU organises two very interesting workshops in parallel with
EuroSPI. (see section 4. of this email)

EuroSPI's mission is to develop an experience and knowledge exchange
platform for Europe where SPI practices can be discussed and exchanged and
knowledge can be gathered and shared. This mission is implemented by three
major action lines:

1. An annual EuroSPI conference supported by Software Process Improvement
Networks from different EU countries. 2. Establishing an Internet based
knowledge library, newsletters, and a set of proceedings and recommended
books.
 3. Establishing an effective team of national representatives (in future
from each EU country) growing step by step into more countries of Europe.

EuroSPI is a successful initiative since 1994. Annual conferences were
held 1994 in Dublin (Ireland), 1995 in Vienna (Austria), 1996 in Brighton
(UK), 1997 in Budapest (Hungary), 1998 in Gothenburg (Sweden), 1999 in
Pori (Finland), 2000 in Copenhagen (Denmark), 2001 in Limerick (Ireland),
2002 in Nuremberg (Germany), 2003 in Graz (Austria), 2004 in Trondheim
(Norway), 2005 in Budapest (Hungary).

Find more at http://www.eurospi.net


7. In case of interest
======================

Contact [log in to unmask] , or open http://2004.eurospi.net where you can
view the HTML version and download a pdf version of the conference
program.

The pdf version contains also a registration form, if you do not want to
use the online registration functions.

-- 
Dr Richard Messnarz
Director ISCN
General Chair EuroSPI Initiative (www.eurospi.net)
http://www.eurospi.net

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager