Thought you folks would appreciate the response I got to my suggestions to
enhance their definition of Ada.
W (301) 640-3632 (in person M-F: 9am-5pm EST, voicemail any time)
Fax -4750 or -4940
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 13:21:38 -0500
From: Phil Margolis <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: User Definition Correction
Hello Rush -
You Ada folks sure do make a potent lobbying force. We have added Ada to
our programming languages page. We'll conisder your other recommendation to
mention Ada's unique ANSI and ISO status.
- Philip Margolis
Sandy Bay Software
At 07:42 AM 11/26/96 -0700, you wrote:
>submitted on November 26, 1996
>EMAIL: [log in to unmask]
>Comments: I checked out your Webopedia after a friend, Dr. Michael Feldman
>of GWU recommended it to me. It's a great idea and I look forward to
>exploring it further in the near future.
>In reading your description of the Ada programming language you neglect to
>mention that it is the first (and perhaps only) ANSI & ISO standardized
>object-oriented programming language.
>In addition in the listing for standardized programming language, you fail
>to include Ada at all.