He dropped all other addresses from this reply (below)to my Friday
msg titled "Reason for Mr. Paige's Decision Unclear." I think it is
important to circulate his very clear double negative in his last
sentence -- opponents of Ada will want to interpret his recent
decision as the opposite (i.e., that he has given up on Ada as of
value to the DoD).
From: "Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +" <[log in to unmask]>
To: Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Reason for Mr. Paige's Decision Unclear
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:17:00 -0500
I GOT A LOT OF INPUT AND DISCUSSION BUT THE BUCK HAS TO STOP HERE.I DID
WHAT I BELIEVE IS BEST FOR DOD AND HAVE NOT SAID NOR IMPLIED THAT ADA IS
NOT GOOD FOR DOD.