LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  March 1997

TEAM-ADA March 1997

Subject:

Re: Ada Mandate

From:

Brad Balfour <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Brad Balfour <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:13:36 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

At 10:09 PM -0500 3/11/97, Michael Feldman wrote:
>Richard Riehle wrote:
>>
>> In this discussion of the abrogation of long-standing Ada policy,
>> I have seen no reference to Public Law 101-511, Section 8092, which
>> makes Ada the preferred programming language for the DoD.  Has this
>> law been repealed?  It is my understanding that once a law is passed
>> and ratified, it remains the law unless it has an explicit expiration
>> date (this one does not) or it has been repealed.
>>
>> Richard Riehle
>>
>
>As I recall, this came up a while back. The _legal_ "mandate" (As
>opposed to just DoD internal policy) appeared in an _appropriation_
>law, at the end of the law in what is normally a section of general
>provisions. Generally - in the absence of language to the contrary
>- these things run for the duration of the fiscal year (FY) covered by
>the law.

This was definitively settled on comp.lang.ada with the assistance of Ken
Garlington and the AdaIC. Mike is correct in his
interpretation/rememberance. For a copy of the memo from August 1996 check
out the following comp.lang.ada article (thank you dejanews!)

Brad


---------------

Subject:      Revised AFMC intepretation of Ada law
From:         Ken Garlington <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         1996/08/23
Message-Id:   <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups:   comp.lang.ada

Subject: Re: FYI: AFMC position on Ada Law
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 17:33:38 -0400
From: John Walker <[log in to unmask]>

On 1 August, Ken Garlington posted a 16 July memo from Marilyn Corbin
of the Air Force Materiel Command, commenting on the status of the
Congressional Ada mandate.  In brief, it said the Congressional
mandate was interpreted to be permanent.

The AdaIC has found that, on 5 August, after pursuing the question
further, Ms Corbin revised her memo with one that, in brief, said
that the Congressional wording was interpreted to be *non-permanent*
and limited to only the years in which it appeared in the DoD
Appropriations bill.

She requests that any copies of the 16 July memo be removed or
destroyed.

Following is a copy of her 5 August memo.  Please feel free to contact
if you have any questions on this.

John Walker
AdaIC, 800/232-4211, 703/681-2466, fax: 703/681-2869
direct dial: 703/681-2472               (DSN: 761- )

                     DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
               Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command
                Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Ohio

                                                        5 Aug 96

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ AFMC/ENPP

FROM: HQ AFMC/JAQ

SUBJECT: Ada and Public Law

1.  You asked for our advice on "whether the DoD's use of the
computer language Ada is still mandated by law."  A statute mandating
Ada first appeared in Section 8092 of the FY 91 DoD Appropriations
Act and was subsequently included in Section 8073 of the FY 92
Appropriations Act and Section 9070 of the FY 93 DoD Appropriations
Act.  As discussed below, the history of these Ada statutes, as well
as the statutory language, reveals that none of the statutes were
permanent legislation.  Instead, each of the statutes mandating Ada
is solely applicable to the act in which it was contained.

2.  Since an appropriation act is made for a particular fiscal year,
the starting presumption is that everything contained in the act is
effective only for the fiscal year covered.  This presumption can be
overcome if the statutory language used or the nature of the
provision makes it clear that Congress intended it to be permanent.
The starting point in ascertaining Congress' intent is the language
of the statute.  The first statute mandating Ada "after June 1, 1991"
and "where cost effective" appeared in Section 8092 of the FY 91 DoD
Appropriations Act.  The same mandate was included in Section 8073 of
the FY 92 DoD Appropriations Act.  Section 9070 of the FY 93 DoD
Appropriations Act contained the identical Ada language minus the
June 1, 1991 starting date.  The repeated inclusion of a provision in
annual appropriation acts indicates that it is not considered or
intended by Congress to be permanent.

3.  Another indication that the Ada statutory mandate is not
permanent is the language of the statute.  If the statutory language
uses "words of futurity" and is not changed by Congress in a
subsequent statute, it is considered "permanent" legislation.  "Words
of futurity" usually encompass such wording as "hereafter," "after
the date of approval of this act," or a specific starting date.
Thus, the statutory wording in the FY 91 and 92 Appropriation Acts
appears to be permanent legislation due to the inclusion of the
starting date of June 1, 1991.  However, the repeated inclusion in
the FY 92 and FY93 Appropriation Acts of essentially the same Ada
mandate appearing in the FY91 Appropriation Act indicates that the
language is not considered or intended by Congress to be permanent.
In addition, the last statute containing the Ada mandate (i.e., FY 93
DoD Appropriations Act) do not contain any "words of futurity."

4.  Note the statutory Ada mandate in all three Appropriation Acts
contain the words "notwithstanding any other provision of law," and
is not tied directly to the appropriating language for the fiscal
year.  These factors, however, do not indicate that Congress intended
to make the provisions permanent.  (See GAO/OGC-91-5 Appropriations
Law-Vol 1 for numerous Comptroller General decisions supporting this
opinion.)

5.  In summary, Congress, by repeating essentially the same Ada
mandate in different appropriation acts, indicated that the
provisions were not to be construed as permanent.  In addition, the
FY 93 DoD Appropriation Act, which is the last appropriation act
containing the Ada mandate, contain no "words of futurity."  This,
also, indicates that the legislation is only tied to the funds for
that fiscal year and is not permanent legislation.  Note, however,
that DoD policy requires that a waiver (or special exemption) be
obtained for when Ada is not to be used for the programming language.
A waiver need not be obtained for those applications described in
paragraph F2 of DoDD 3405.1, Computer Programming Language Policy.

6.  If you need more information, you may contact me at 7-5727 or
through E-Mail using CorbinM.

MARILYN CORBIN
Attorney-Advisor
Acquisition Law Directorate
Office of the Staff Judge Advocate

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager