LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  April 1998

TEAM-ADA April 1998

Subject:

Re: Embedded Systems Programming Magazine

From:

Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 18 Apr 1998 02:22:40 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Mark Lundquist wrote:
>
> Another one that I've noticed is the truism that Ada is supposed to be
> good for programming in the large, or the humongous, or whatever.  I've
> heard this in several different forms, along the lines of "C++ is good
> for projects up to a million lines of code or so, but beyond that you
> need Ada."
>
> This theme is repeated by Ada apologists and vendors in the same voice
> or with the same motivations as the "reliability" theme, and with the
> same effects.  It's also repeated by those who wish to sound
> even-handed, or as a concession -- a charitable way of saying "that
> language must have some reason to exist -- maybe it's 'programming in
> the large'...").
>
> In any case, it makes it sound as though there is some penalty for
> using Ada that dominates in small or medium-sized projects, and that
> the benefits do not emerge until you reach the level of "way huge
> program".

Exactly.  The perception is all bass ackwards.

The flavor of both of these statements ("Ada should
be used mainly for very large projects", and "Ada is
mainly good for safety critical projects") is
that Ada is something you only should use if you
absolutely have to, if you've got no other choice,
or when you're backed into a corner because of
the size of your project or its safety requirements.
Continuing to sell Ada along these lines will be its
downfall for two reasons: 1) projects that fit in
either of these two categories are not any kind of
mainstream, not even the mainstream of the real-time
systems niche; and 2) programmers are persuaded that
Ada a necessary evil rather than an enjoyable and
useful tool.

That's why I say that these kinds of appeals are
useful only for attracting systems engineers and
project managers to Ada, not programmers.  Managers
think of *all* programming languages (and
programmers!) as necessary evils to begin with.
Only programmers get excited about programming
languages.  Who's leading the Java "revolution"?
Managers?  If you think so, you're wrong.
Managers (as managers; yes, there are plenty of
software project managers who are programmers at
heart) don't give a damn about programming
languages.  Neither do executives or marketing
people or accountants.  No one in the organization
cares about programming languages at all except
the programmers.

What actually has to happen in real life is that
programmers and their managers and the project's
systems engineers have to come to an *agreement*
to use Ada.  So, it's OK to continue to try
to convince managers and systems engineers to
choose Ada, but if the programmers in that shop
do not want Ada, it won't happen; or at least it
won't last.  Ask Ed Seidewitz.

But as long as we are talking about things that
persuade the managers, we might try a different
tack there as well.  There are really only two
concrete things in a manager's mind (and no,
I'm not implying they all have rocks in their
heads!): schedule and budget.  To persuade project
managers, you need to demonstrate that these two
things are going to be powerfully affected by the
choice of programming language, and that they will
get dramatic results by choosing Ada.  How you
do this is up to you; but let me suggest a very
insightful piece of literature that may help:
"How to Lie with Statistics" by Darrel Huff.

Just kidding.

But really, all the information is out there and
has been available for some time to make a good
management case for Ada (cf. the Zeigler paper and
the other presentations at AdaIC); it has simply lain
fallow without being incorporated into a wide-
spread marketing campaign.  Practically the only
people who have read or seen that material are DoD
software people, squirreled away from the world in
black monolithic buildings engraved with the words
"Ministry of Peace" (ok, so I get carried away; sue
me); the rest of the world doesn't have a clue.  You
can't just "build it and they will come", you've
got to get the message out in a focused, intelligent
way to the right people.

I tell my managers at work every now and then
"I'd hate to see what this project would be like
if we had used C or C++; we'd be so far behind
it would kill us."  Or, "Most of the integration
problems we've been having on this project are
the places where we have stepped outside the
bounds of the language.  Where the Ada compiler
has been able to check things for us, we've had
very little difficulty".

(Since one of my managers reads this list, I'd
better say in a hurry that I'm never lying or
even exaggerating when I make these statements.
Hi Larry! ;)

Stanley Allen
mailto:[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager