LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA Archives

TEAM-ADA Archives


TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA Home

TEAM-ADA  June 1999

TEAM-ADA June 1999

Subject:

Re: Help me to grow young developers

From:

David S Croston Melling <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 4 Jun 1999 05:43:20 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (148 lines)

-- regarding what Richard wrote

here here... I absolutely agree that were getting thin on the ground.

However, one must after 15 years of Ada be looking more for project
management and more senior project consulting roles, where you can
impart your vast experience to your clients (and be paid more to boot)
- and also  recommend the use of Ada 95 ;-)

I've seen many die hard blinkered Ada (programmer) contractors bite the
dust as they've either been unwilling to adopt new technologies or been
unwilling to move up the ladder to higher level consulting and remained
inflexible.

Working in Java based systems is not only is directly more financially
viable due to higher rates of pay, but often is tightly coupled with
the need to know more overlapping technologies like OOA/OOD Methods,
UML, CORBA EJB etc. and even a foreign language etc etc, and that's why
the pay is better - there are not too many people who have the whole
set of tools under their belt. Gone are the days of being payed heaps
for just knowing the ALRM.

I know in the UK most of the Ada work contractors are given is grundge
stuff that no-one else wants to do and its usually for high inertia
inefficient defense companies with many a disaster story to tell - and
an absolutely appalling 'british' attitude to freelancers (but thats
another discussion).

Fortunately on the continent (Europe) there are still many non-defence
companies willing to use Ada 95 the mood is more appealing - and there
are some very interesting projects about, combining with new methods
and techniques, in financial sectors and in the power and transport
industries, not to mention simulation, aviation, space and comms - all
non defence sectors.

It is my opinion that the defence industry has done Ada more harm than
good, ironically as it actually nurtured Ada in the first place so to
speak.

I agree Ada95 is undoubtably a superior language than Java & C++ by the
way, but we cant just sit around knocking Java and C++ and singing
Ada's praises while each month the Java & C++ world just gets on with
it and does it.

I've seen this all before when Algol68 - it had its time.

I await the flak.

Dave Croston-Melling


--- Richard Stuckey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello, All,
>
> This is my first posting to this list, although I have been lurking
> for
> a while (unlike the Americans with Disabilities Act man :-) ).
>
> Dean Esposito said:
>
> >> We have a real problem with the MYTH that becoming an Ada
> developer
> will limit your career choices in the future
>
> Well, here in the UK it is sadly true that it DOES limit your career
> choices.  By way of example, Jobserve (the largest IT jobs website in
> the UK - http://www.jobserve.com) today lists only 117 jobs for Ada
> developers, compared to 1758 for Java and 3452 for C++.  Also, the
> pay
> is far better: the most I ever see offered for an Ada job is 40K GBP
> (most are a lot less!), whereas C++ jobs go up to 80K, and Java as
> high
> as 100K.
>
> I have used Ada for most of the last 15 years (writing Ada compilers
> &
> debuggers, and various other tools, etc.), and would not use anything
> else by preference.  However, I am now working for a company where I
> have to use Microsoft's Visual C++ Developer Studio (and even
> COBOL!!!!
> - to do systems programming, believe that if you can!!!!!) - and I am
> appalled both by how crude and unsafe the language is, and by the
> hideous over-complexity of all the baggage that surrounds it,
> compared
> to the simple elegance of Ada.
>
> I have also been learning Java, since I think that it is the only
> real
> career choice for me now; and though it is considerably better than
> C++,
> I find it extremely depressing that the language's designers have
> thrown
> away virtually everything that has been so painfully learned over the
> past decades of language design evolution about the value of strong
> (rigorous in Ada!) typing, and the separation of specification from
> implementation.
>
> What is even more depressing is the blank looks that I receive from
> my
> new colleagues (all C++ / Microsoft people) when I extoll the virtues
> of
> Ada - the bugs that I have to track down and fix now just couldn't
> occur
> in Ada, but they simply can't see anything wrong with C++!  I
> recently
> tried to explain to one of them how Ada's distinction between package
> specification and body makes it an ideal choice for transparently
> distributing the code of an application across client and server by
> means of an RPC mechanism (something we need for our products), only
> to
> be told "Oh, that's just the same as COM" - where you have to specify
> your interface in IDL, then generate a special API which you then
> have
> to call.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't see any hope of the situation improving here -
> apart from some defence-related work, Ada's market penetration is
> minute, and seems to be dwindling all the time.
>
> Hope this hasn't depressed you too much!
>
>
>          Richard Stuckey
> > begin:vcard
> n:Stuckey;Richard
> tel;home:+44  0118   9456076
> tel;work:+44  01635  565466
> x-mozilla-html:TRUE
> url:http://homepages.enterprise.net/stuckey00000
> adr:;;;Reading;Berkshire;RG30 6NF;England
> version:2.1
> email;internet:[log in to unmask]
> note;quoted-printable:Richard Stuckey is a compiler-writer with many
> years experience in=0D=0Acompilers, debuggers, runtime systems,
> etc.=0D=0A=0D=0AHe has worked on Ada compiler projects for Systems
> Designers=0D=0A(now EDS),  Alsys (now Aonix) and ICL (now a load of
> crap).=0D=0A=0D=0AHe is currently working for MERANT (formerly Micro
> Focus) in their=0D=0ACompiler Tools Group.
> fn:Richard Stuckey
> end:vcard
>

===
DSCM Home via : http://consultancy.gotoinfo.ch/dscm/dscm.htm
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager