Print

Print


So then, John P. Woodruff says this:
>
> I'm not so sure that it's time for Draconian measures on the basis of
> today's experience.  I don't think one inappropriate message (granted, with
> several echoes) merits significant changes to policy.  Let's wait a bit to
> see if the situation persists.
>
> Besides, if the list were about to become substantially different, surely
> the psychic would have mentioned that fact in her message  ;-)
>
>
> --
> John Woodruff                                   N I F   \ ^ /
> Lawrence Livermore National Lab               =====---- < o >
> 925 422 4661                                            / v \
>

I agree with John.  After taking a closer look at the message
headers I am convinced that there is no "Silvia Brown" and that
its quite likely that GTE.NET's mailservice was exploited to
forward this message so that the true sender could remain
anonymous.  I do intend to find out who the telephone service
provider is and complain to them.  (T'would be a delicous irony
if it turns out to be GTE :)

--
Scott Ingram
Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory