Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:55:03 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:42:31PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
"At 12:47 PM 11/29/2004, Harbaugh, John S wrote:
[..]
>[..] Fully qualified dot naming, [..]
[..]
>all contribute to a mindset that values programs which read like
>structured English.
I agree with this to a point. My one argument, though, is that people
(even Ada people) seem to ignore the use of fully-qualified names whenever
they can. I find this "wordiness" to be one of the most useful aspects of
the language. Nearly every time I download an example Ada program from the
net it seems to start with "with X; use X;", leading to potentially
confusing code.
[..]"
I am also disappointed that Ada programmers often use use clauses.
|
|
|