TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:09:19 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> >Wouldn't it be a nice change if some other language group was using and/or
> >writing bindings to Ada components?
>
> Sort of. I see it as a double-edged sword - on the one hand it helps to show
> people how useful, efficient and re-usable Ada is (and efficient), but on the
> other hand it shows how easy it is to access Ada code from other languages.

Or might it show people that interfacing to Ada from other languages is
not nearly as easy as interfacing to other languages from Ada?  :-)

--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau

ATOM RSS1 RSS2