TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Roger Racine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:57:59 -0700
Reply-To:
Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Anti-Ada Arguments
From:
Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Message from Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]> of "Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:00:55 PDT."
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
From:  Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>

> OK -- why would they wait until 65% of the work was done before
> conducting a review?  That is purely a product management decision.  How
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                         'scuse me, I meant to say,
                                         "project management"...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2