TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2000 09:11:06 +0000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
In-Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
Richard Riehle wrote:

>For example, there is still a large readership
>devoted to I-8051 processors and others in that category.

>The reality is that Ada does not meet the needs of these
>programmers, largely because

>                    1) There are no Ada compilers,

I had a look at ESP's website last night and I searched for Ada. It came up with
15 or so matches (most of which were Green Hills advertising), but I'm sure I
saw a list that suggested there *was* an Ada compiler targetted to the 8051. I
remember it because I was surprised to find it, but I'll check again tonight in
case I'm wrong.

John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2