TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:02:41 -0500
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (13 lines)
> > I never think that there's much point in trying to stop bandwagons of
> > this type. People are now realising that Java has severe limitations
> > but we won't turn the clock back to Ada.
> "Back"? Ada 95 is _newer_ than Java. Try turning the clock forward!

And Ada 83 was better than Java in most respects.  C -> Java is a step forward.
Ada 83 -> Java is BACKWARD.

Wes Groleau