TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:01:33 +0300
Reply-To: "Alexander E. Kopilovich" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>; from Jean-Pierre Rosen at Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:39:05 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Alexander E. Kopilovich" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines)
> I come to think that Ada is *more* appropriate for small, non critical
> projects than for its traditional market.
> If you have big, highly critical projects, you'll have the money to
> spend time and run tools that prove that the project can't fail
> irrespectively of the programming language. If you don't have the money,
> then the added value of Ada's checks provides a much bigger added value.

In other words, for some small projects relying on Ada is a good way to keep
the project small.