Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:42:29 -0700 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No,
not all will be on Windoze, many will be on Sun or
SGI systems at least at first.
Can we do both?
> ----------
> From: David Botton
> Reply To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 1999 22:12
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Access Database
>
> If all your clients are on Windows, I would take out
> GLADE from the middle and access the databases using a
> binding to ADO and/or RDO (see
> http://www.adapower.com/com). They were designed with
> conserving network resources in mind in particular
> over the net.
>
> David Botton
>
>
> --- "Dale Jr, William" <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > We are moving into the Win NT world ( kicking and
> > screaming) because we
> > need a database and Access is all we can get. I
> > know Dave Botton is
> > working on COM/DCOM tools for NT.
> >
> > Is there a free API for the ACCESS Database run-time
> > Engine? We are looking
> > at building a Glade server on the NT system which
> > other (client) Ada code
> > will talk to get data from the Access database.
> > This replaces a flat data
> > file system that we have outgrown.
> >
> > Anyone been down this path?
> >
> >
> > ====//====
> > "The difference between hardware and software is
> > that the more you play
> > with hardware, the more likely you are to break it,
> > but the more you play
> > with software the more likely you are to FIX it."
> > ====//====
> >
> > Bill Dale , LMMS
> > mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>
|
|
|