Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:31:09 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Roger Racine wrote:
> I am the software task lead for a new project. I (of course)
> selected Ada as the language, to decrease the cost and schedule risk
> for this part of the project. Unfortunately, as soon as the top
> three people (Program Manager, Technical Director, and a systems
> engineer) at my company found out about it, they immediately thought
> I had increased the risk, and asked for justification for using what
> was thought to be unproven technology.
What technology do they consider "proven"?
> It did help to show that the front end was used by many compiler
> vendors (and all targets for the required vendor's Ada compilers) and
> the back end is used by the vendor's C compiler (which is well
> trusted).
C is proven technology. Proven to increase errors and costs, compared to
Ada.
--
Jeff Carter
"Sheriff murdered, crops burned, stores looted,
people stampeded, and cattle raped."
Blazing Saddles
|
|
|