TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen Leake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen Leake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:36:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Peter Hermann <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> I dislike moderation by a human person because of the disadvantage
> of time delay as well as personal taste.
> Moreover, from time to time one of us has some urgent need to
> be helped for some off-topic topic :-)
> for which I am grateful at least for one event in the past.
>
> Therefore I recommend allowing subscribers only.
> Upon fraud, skip her from the list.
>
> This solution is simple but efficient.

I agree with this.

The spam discussion has occured on other lists I read, and the
consensus there seems to be that allowing only subscribers to post
removes a lot of spam.

I expect people who post to this list asking for help to also read the
list, so they can offer help to others. It's a two-way street. So I
don't see that we lose anything by restricting posters to also be
readers.

--
-- Stephe

ATOM RSS1 RSS2