TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:06:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:00:06 PDT." <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Edward Colbert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (13 lines)
There are some problems with the ACES, most of which are the all-too-common
software errors that can be worked around.  One can certainly argue that
there are problems with the general testing scheme and it's validity, but
I still believe that it gives you the best "artificial" performance profile
that you can get.  It's certainly no worse than the (obsoloscent) PIWG set,
and arguably far better.

(I note that your return address specifies "rivendell".  In the same context,
my laptop is named "Galadriel".)