TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 07:39:52 -0500
Reply-To:
james hopper <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
james hopper <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Both os x and linux.  what i was doing was passing real time radar
images from our sim code on the server to the display app on another
computer.  the difference was quite dramatic.  i could get 60 hz with
AdaSockets, but only about 10hz with gnat sockets.   i was in a bit of
a rush and never really went into what was causing the difference.

best jim

On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 12:52  AM, Simon Wright wrote:

>> From: james hopper <[log in to unmask]>
>
>>                              i found that the gnat version of
>> sockets is really slow compared to the adasockets stuff.
>
> Interesting, I wonder why, most of it seems to be a pretty thin
> binding over the C or OS socket calls .. was this on OS X?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2