TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Carlisle Martin C Dr USAFA/DFCS <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-To: "Wiley, Coyote (John T)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Carlisle Martin C Dr USAFA/DFCS <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (33 lines)
One should really also read the rebuttal in:

The article cited below is actually quite negative.

Martin C. Carlisle, PhD
Associate Professor of Computer Science
United States Air Force Academy

-----Original Message-----
From: Wiley, Coyote (John T) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Recent "CrossTalk" article

Please excuse if this is a duplicate--I haven't seen it yet on this list.
Pro-Ada findings from a very recent study.

"The Theater High Altitude Area Defense program commissioned a study on the
long-term viability and staying power of Ada after the demise of its mandate
in 1997. The study would help decision makers determine if Ada had the
staying power to support future systems, or whether an alternative should be
sought. This article puts the results of that study in the public domain."

--John Wiley, Intergraph (Huntsville, AL, USA)
[log in to unmask] (256) 730-2567