TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:30:02 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)
> why there isn't as much homebuilt freeware for Ada
Two more contributing reasons:
1) A lot of interesting stuff is hardware or OS specific and Ada
hardware and OSes are less concentrated than C. Not so long ago nearly
all C programmers were using DOS (or extended DOS) and a VESA graphics
package would run on their systems.  I suspect only a minority of the
Ada community even *could* run such a thing on their system. So to some
extent "why isn't there more Ada freeware" has the same answer as "why
isn't there more software for X, where X /= Wintel".
2) With the Wintel platform, at least, it's difficult to make an
executable small enough to expect people to download, even with "56K"
modems.  And a lot of source or executables are incomplete without a
bunch of associated libraries and DLLs which are inconvenient, if not
violations of contracts, to post.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2