CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brigitte Eaton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brigitte Eaton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:15:38 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
does anybody have any solid numbers/stats about how much people rely on the
standard blue & purple link colors?

i've seen at least 3 discussions on different newsgroups about whether or
not to use standard links. it usually comes down to designers saying "it's
ok to change the colors to match the design, people understand underlined
links" and usability people saying that it's important to keep standard
colors. but no one seems to have any proof of this, and if i make a case to
my boss, i'd like to have facts backing me up.

tia,
brig



--------------------------
brigitte eaton
http://www.eatonweb.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2