CHI-ANNOUNCEMENTS Archives

ACM SIGCHI General Interest Announcements (Mailing List)

CHI-ANNOUNCEMENTS@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Susanne Jul <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:54:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
2nd Call for Participation

==============================================================
BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN LEARNING, ENJOYING AND WORKING
A one-day Critical Computing Workshop
--------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.sjul.org/boundaries05
[log in to unmask]

Critical Computing
20-24 August 2005
Aarhus, Denmark
http://www.aarhus2005.org
==============================================================

POSITION PAPERS due June 26 (July 25 for late acceptance, if space is 
available)

-------------------------------------------------
BOUNDARIES BETWEEN LEARNING, ENJOYING AND WORKING
-------------------------------------------------
People learn (only) in school, are productive (only) at work and enjoy 
themselves (only) elsewhere, right?  No? That's the impression often 
imparted by information technology: entertainment software is distinct 
from productivity tools and both differ from educational technology.  
Blurring the boundaries between learning, enjoying and working will be 
increasingly critical as information technology matures, becomes more 
diverse and enters new dimensions of human existence. This need is 
already evident, for example, in efforts to incorporate "fun" as a 
design value for productivity tools, or to support understanding and 
solving of real-world problems in educational technologies.

Research and design communities also reflect these boundaries, differing 
in values, practices and expertise. For instance, educational designers 
emphasize "reflective design" (stressing interpretation, understanding 
and reasoning), whereas productivity designers emphasize "behavioral 
design" (stressing use and experience), while entertainment designers 
emphasize "visceral design" (stressing appearance, touch, and feel).  
Development of boundary-blurring technologies will require understanding 
ways and implications of crossing the boundaries in both research and 
design settings.

The purpose of the workshop is to examine, systematically, opportunities 
for and implications of research, design and development of integrated 
technologies, and explore ways of helping designers and researchers to 
cross boundaries. The objectives of the workshop are to develop an 
understanding of the opportunities for, limitations of and issues raised 
by blurring boundaries, and to outline a research agenda for 
technologies that allow people simultaneously to learn, enjoy themselves 
and be productive, and to do so across all the settings -- work, home, 
play -- in which they conduct their lives.

-----------------
DISCUSSION TOPICS
-----------------
Topics for discussion will primarily be derived from participants' 
suggestions and interests. However, they might include:

* Implications and Opportunities for Integrated Technologies
    - Are there venues for integrated technologies that are particularly
      appropriate or inappropriate?
    - Do integrated technologies pose special social or ethical concerns?
    - What conflicts might blurring boundaries present? E.g., automating
      subtasks to increase productivity vs. exposing them to increase 
learning.
    - Do integrated technologies introduce new or specialized computational
      problems?

* Benefits of Integrating Technologies
    - How might research or design communities benefit from looking across
      boundaries?
    - What do different research and design communities have to offer each
      other?

* Process and Methodological Changes
    - Do design processes and methodologies differ for different spheres of
      purpose or types of design, and what changes are needed for integrated
      technologies?
    - Do research questions and methods differ by purpose or type of design,
      and what changes are needed for integrated technologies?

* Research Agenda
    - How might viewing technology across boundaries affect research, design
      and development?
    - What research questions might be raised or answered by integration?
    - What research questions must be answered to achieve integration?
    - How can opportunities for research, design and development across
      boundaries be created and supported?

---------------
IMPORTANT DATES
---------------
June 26:    Position papers due
June 30:    Notification of acceptance

July 1:     Early registration deadline

July 25:    Late position papers due (if space is available)
Aug 1:      Notification of acceptance (late position papers)

Aug 20:     Workshop takes place in Aarhus, Denmark

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
                To unsubscribe, send an empty email to
     mailto:[log in to unmask]
    For further details of CHI lists see http://sigchi.org/listserv
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2