TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Botton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 13:32:00 -0800
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
And Lotus 123 for DOS is at 30 to 50 function points.

---"W. Wesley Groleau x4923"
> I can't vouch for the accuracy of the information, but Capers Jones
and
> Software Productivity Research believe that Eiffel and perl will have
> higher productivity than Ada.
>
> They put Ada at 10-20 function points per staff-month
> and perl or Eiffel at 16-23.
>
> http://www.spr.com/library/0langtbl.htm  -  Capers Jones' data
> http://www.spr.com/library/0funcmet.htm  -  a discussion of that data
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2