Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:03:49 -0800
|
Why a heuristic evaluation specific to a Web 2.0 site? This seems to me,
to be akin to putting a defining term on something where none is needed.
What would be different about evaluating a web 2.0 site, as opposed to any
other? Web 2.0 (and I'll admit I hate the term) simply refers to an
evolution of the web as a platform. It's generally about semantic
content, user-generation, sharing and building iteratively and
collectively. I'm still trying to figure out why you would evaluate that
differently than a more static site.
Aren't the issues (or maybe guiding principles for evaluation), more or
less, the same?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
James Wanless
User Experience Design (Senior Systems Analyst)
Web Services, IT Services
British Columbia Institute of Technology
3700 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby, BC, V5G 3H2
Tel: 604-456-1119 - Fax: 604-439-6785
Email: [log in to unmask] - Web: www.bcit.ca/its
Technology changes everything.
"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote on 22/02/2008 03:42:38 PM:
> I am looking to conduct a heuristic evaluation on a Web 2.0 site. Does
> anyone know of any Guidelines or Heuristics out their specifically for
Web
> 2.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kim
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Tip of the Day: Quote only what you need from earlier postings
> CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask]
with any comments, questions or problems
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|