TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Mike Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 06:47:20 -0700
Reply-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (11 lines)
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Mike Brenner wrote:

> Bob Leif suggested (below) that Ada-95 be treated asthe successful
> successor to Java. This is a good marketing strategy and would be

  My June column in JOOP (Journal of Object-Oriented Programming) is about
  using Ada instead of Java for creating Java Applets.  I hope that some
  of the JOOP readers will pay attention to it.

  Richard Riehle

ATOM RSS1 RSS2