TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Ed Falis <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 08:06:31 -0700
Reply-To: Edward Colbert <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Edward Colbert <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Ed,

I got a message saying that the following bounced.  So...

Take Care,

-----Original Message-----
From:   Edward Colbert [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Saturday, April 19, 1997 12:33 PM
To:     'Ed Falis'
Cc:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        RE: Are there Problems with the ACES?

Hi Ed,

>    My personal opinion is that the suite delivers small bang for the buck
>    involved in setting it up and running it, and that its architecture is
>    over-engineered to the characteristics of Ada 83 development systems (and
>    that it would need a very substantial reworking to fix it).

We're using the ACES as a set of code to test that an Ada 95 compiler can compile more than the ACVC, rather than trying to use the ACES to evaluate performance.  Do you think it would still be "small bang for the buck"?  Do you have alternate suggestions?

Take Care,