ACM SIGCHI General Interest Announcements (Mailing List)


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Effie Law <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Effie Law <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:47:03 +0000
text/plain (95 lines)
Call for Participation: CHI 2013 Workshop

== Made for Sharing: HCI Stories of Transfer, Triumph and Tragedy ===

Date: 27th April 2013
Venue: Palais de Congrès de Paris, France

Contribution Submission Deadline: *18th January 2013 *
Author Notification: 8th February 2013

Workshop website:

=== Abstract ===
Share your triumphs and tragedies with methods in structured case 
studies of  HCI professionals transfer design and evaluation methods 
across project contexts through appropriating and configuring 
method-resources, resulting in knowledge that can inform: (i) creation 
of new methods, (ii) training for method novices, and (iii) a firmer 
groundwork for systematic analysis of HCI methods. We will narrate, 
analyze and synthesize our shared stories together in the workshop.

== Motivation ==
The success of HCI approaches is beyond doubt, yet remains limited, and 
there is still considerable scope for transferring new User Experience 
(UX) practices to new application contexts and design settings. We need 
to better understand how HCI approaches are transferred between usage 
contexts. The main contribution of the workshop will be a deeper 
understanding of how HCI 'methods' (including practices, approaches, 
etc.) are transferred across a range of design contexts, which may be 
distinguished by application domain or project or organizational 
constraints. These deeper understandings will be grounded in case 
studies submitted to the workshop. The workshop will explore 
transferring "methods-as-configurable-combinational-resources", which 
involves analysis, appropriation, adaptation and synthesis of re-usable 
resources (Woolrych et al. 2011). We will use narratives to expose the 
complexity of the following:
* Perception and assessment of the role of methods in real-life design 
and evaluation settings
* Externalization of HCI professionals' repertoire for modifying 
resources of an existing HCI method by taking into account contextual 
factors of a new project
* Compatibility of HCI methods with new contexts

== Submission ==
For this workshop, we invite:
* UX practitioners to submit case studies of (un)successful transfer of 
HCI methods from 'old' to 'new' interaction design contexts.
* UX researchers with theoretical positions on the nature of interaction 
design work to submit position papers on frameworks for understanding 
methods, approaches and re-usable resources and their relation to design 
work in specific project settings.

Accepted case studies and theoretical positions will provide a corpus 
for analysis at the CHI workshop. We will focus on the design work 
required to get HCI methods to work, and how this is impacted by 
contextual factors such as application domains, organizational factors 
and project constraints. Of particular interest for this workshop is the 
relationship between specific re-usable methodological resources and 
their commoditization into design 'methods' on the one hand, and the 
realities of UX work on the other. The work required to bridge theory 
and practice is a key focus.

Guidelines are provided for describing a case study (4-6 pages, SIGCHI 
format). An audio recording of 15-20 minutes is an alternative format.

Submissions are to be sent to Effie Law per email <[log in to unmask]>
All workshop participants must register for both the workshop and for at 
least one day of the main conference.
The reason for this policy is that workshops are part of the CHI 

== Workshop Organizers ==
Effie Law, University of Leicester, UK
Ebba Hvannberg, University of Iceland, Iceland
Arnold P.O.S. Vermeeren, TU Delft, the Netherlands
Gilbert Cockton, Northumbria University, UK
Timo Jokela, Joticon Oy/Aalto University, Finland

== References ==
Woolrych, A., Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E., & Cockton, G. (2011). 
Ingredients and meals rather than recipes: A proposal for research that 
does not treat usability evaluation methods as indivisible wholes. Int. 
J. HCI 27(10), 940-70.

    For news of CHI books, courses & software, join CHI-RESOURCES
     mailto: [log in to unmask]

    To unsubscribe from CHI-ANNOUNCEMENTS send an email to
     mailto:[log in to unmask]

    For further details of CHI lists see