TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:36:25 +0000
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines)
>I have found that the Ada REQUIREMENT that all values of the case be present is
>important to maintenance.  If I have two programs, one in C/C++ that uses
>enumerations, and one in Ada that also uses the enumerations, when I add a
>value to the set of enumerations
>
>   ALL MY Ada CODE BREAKS, it fails to compile;  which is *exactly* what
>I want.

Even if you have "when others =>" :-)

John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2