TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 16:19:06 -0600
From: James Squire <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc: Patrick Wilson <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: McDonnell Douglas Aerospace
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (30 lines)
Rush Kester; Senior Software Engineer wrote:
>
> Mr. Paige has decided to remove the "Ada Mandate" (see his note below).
>
> >From [log in to unmask] Wed Mar  5 22:19:32 1997
> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 07:49:00 -0500
> From: "Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Rush Kester; Senior Software Engineer" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: RE: Sincere thanks for speaking at 2/26th joint ACM meeting
>
> THANKS.
> IT HELPED ME DECIDE WHAT I SHOULD DO.
> ANNOUNCED MY DECISION THE NEXT MORNING.
> NO ADA MANDATE FOR ANY SYSTEMS ANY LONGER. WILL PROVIDE THE SUSTAINING
> SUPPORT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NRC.
> WILL EXPECT THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PLAN AND THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
> THATS BEST FOR THE APPLICATION TO WIN.
> HOPE ADA95 WILL INDEED PROVE TO BE THE BEST FOR MOST APPLICATIONS.. GOOD
> LUCK.

Was this announcement written up anywhere on the Web?
--
James Squire           mailto:m193884 no junk mail
[log in to unmask]
MDA Avionics Tools & Processes
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace              http://www.mdc.com/
Opinions expressed here are my own and NOT my company's
"Things are changing on Earth and not all for the best."
        -- Sinclair, "By Any Means Necessary"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2