TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 23:57:48 -0400
Reply-To: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
From: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> from "AdaWorks" at Jun 14, 2000 03:53:12 PM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (28 lines)
[asked Richard]
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Jeff Carter wrote:
> > Boeing and Airbus could both have chosen C++ for their
> > commercial-jetliner fly-by-wire software. However, they both chose to
> > use Ada.
> I wonder where the documentation is for the assertion that Airbus
> is programmed in Ada.  Would be good if this were publicly available.
> Originally, Airbus was not programmed in Ada.  Perhaps there is some
> report somewhere that provides more information on this.

There is a report or two on an Airbus subsystem in tghe "success stories"
(application briefs, whatever) linked from the AdaIC and SIGAda
education sites. I'm traveling and just reading mail quickly,
so I don't have precise URLs, but you should be able to fish
around a bit.
> As a side thought, an article on the use of Ada for commercial avionics
> would be entertaining in a publication such as Aviation Week.

I agree.

> Richard Riehle
Mike Feldman