Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jul 1998 13:02:41 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What Elizabeth said. I would never use a primary navigation device that required Javascript (or Java or Shockwave, etc.) as long as:
a) so many people keep that "feature" turned off for security and/or crashing reasons
b) so many browser versions in the world do not (fully) support it
UNLESS I could dictate the platform my users would access the site with. Even then, if the site is planned to be long-lived, chances are things would change over time that would cause a structural redesign of the site, because of the use of that technology.
Even browser-detection with Javascript (e.g., for forms/noforms redirects) fails miserably much of the time. Javascript is the best way to prevent ~ 50% of your potential audience from using your Web site.
Susan Farrell
>Elizabeth Buie said:
>As I understand it, to implement a pull-down without using a Go
>button requires JavaScript. (Is this correct?) In my book, that in
>itself would be enough to forbid it (unless it's in a tightly
>controlled intranet, but even there I'd still recommend against it).
---
Susan Farrell Human Computer Interaction
Sun Microsystems, Inc. 650.786.3173 (v) (x83173)
901 San Antonio Rd. MS UMPK17-101 650.786.5723 (f) B17-1126
Palo Alto, CA 94303 [log in to unmask]
|
|
|