CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Challis Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Challis Hodge <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Nov 1999 21:46:11 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>William Pawlak wrote:
>
>Michael Fry wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, I've been unable to find anything redeeming about the
> > link style.
> > ...
> > Indeed, the underline is an affordance, isn't it?
> >
> > What makes site designers think that removing
> > the underline from text links will do anything but confuse their
> > readership?
>
>It looks "cooler and cleaner" according to a designer friend of mine,
>even *after* he admitted it confused the hell out of his parents when
>they were trying to navigate his site.  Sad.
>
>In my opinion, one of the biggest problems with most info system design
>tools, technologies, and languages is that, in the interest of
>flexibiliy, they allow you to manipulate almost every aspect of the
>output, at the risk of allowing - perhaps even promoting - bad
>usability/design.

It is very difficult to label the manipulation of outputs, such as
underlined hypertext links, as "bad
usability/design" when the conventions may well exist in the first place by
default or habit. Sometimes, if it makes sense, we change things. If not we
might still have slavery and no women voting here in the US :-)

-challis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2