CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Skot Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Skot Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:02:02 -0700
text/plain (62 lines)
I'd question whether they're any more effective than "non-rotating" banners as well. People tend to scan past advertising. Does the rotation draw the eye back to the space, or just annoy?

On Aug-19-2010, at 09:10 , Nancy Brigham wrote:

> I don't have any research to offer, but I do share your concern. That's why I design such banners with info that is inspiring rather than essential to the content. And I use cookies so that each time the user visits, he or she sees a different version of the banner.  This is especially helpful on a site that doesn't update very frequently.
> I hope others respond to this thread.
> Nancy
> Adam Guasch-Melendez wrote:
>> Has anyone done any research - or come across any - on auto-rotating content
>> banners? I don't mean ad banners, I mean sites such as the White House (
>> and the many US government sites that replicate
>> the feature ( or Generally, it's
>> a large banner with a strong graphic image and a short header or descriptive
>> text that links to a secondary page; the banner rotates through four or more
>> options, and also allows users to click through the options.
>> Although the sites that use this feature clearly intend to attract attention
>> to each of the rotating elements, I think it's also possible that if the
>> initial topic doesn't grab the user's attention, a casual user scanning the
>> page may simply read - and scroll - past the banner on to the rest of the
>> page rather than waiting for the rotation or clicking through, so that items
>> intended to be "featured" are never seen at all. I'm not comfortable with
>> relying on users' willingness to break their browsing habits (scanning, in
>> this case). But that's just speculation, and I'd love to see research. Can
>> anyone point me in the right direction?
>>    --------------------------------------------------------------
>>    Tip of the Day: Use the archives to research common questions
>>     CHI-WEB: POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>    --------------------------------------------------------------
>   --------------------------------------------------------------
>       Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask]
>              with any comments, questions or problems
>           CHI-WEB:
>             MODERATOR: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>   --------------------------------------------------------------

Skot Nelson
[log in to unmask]

	"In anything at all, perfection is finally attained not when
	 there is no longer anything to add, but when there
	 is no longer anything to take away."
	      -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, Wind, Sand and Stars

        Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask]
               with any comments, questions or problems
              MODERATOR: mailto:[log in to unmask]