CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Brenton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Brenton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:14:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
I agree with Aras. If an interface is able to allow the user and machine to
communicate in such a way that traditional text-like syntax is not necessary
to create a program, I think it's great. There is nothing wrong with
communicating visually (as opposed to auditory-sequential communication).
Research has shown that engineers tend to favor visual learning styles, so
this may even be a better method of communication for some programmers. It's
just a different type of language.



On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Aras Kannu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I agree with you in general. However, I assumed the inquiry was based on
> the assumption that the non-programmer had the aptitude to do high level
> programming. I do not think we are expecting this type of high level
> programmers to open Visual Studio or Eclipse and be able to develop
> applications. In my experience, I have come across people (maybe a few)
> who could successfully do that if they had the right tools. So, I would
> say power to them and ask why not.
>
> Aras Kannu | Principal Architect, User Experience| www.infor.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon, Richard
> (CDC/OCOO/FMO) (CTR)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:43 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Seeking examples of IDEs with intuitive UIs
>
> Maybe I missed something, but it sounds like maybe what you are looking
> for is more of a rapid prototyping capability (Axure, iRise, Intuitect,
> etc) or some form of pattern library. Do you really intend to develop a
> serious application without real developers? I wouldn't want to go down
> that road. We are still recovering from having so many application
> interfaces developed without real interaction designers; wouldn't this
> be a similar situation? Remember, the devil is in the [gory programming]
> details.
>
> Richard E. Gordon
> User Interface Specialist - SAIC
>
>
>
>    --------------------------------------------------------------
>        Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask]
>               with any comments, questions or problems
>     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
>    --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------
>        Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
>                    mailto:[log in to unmask]
>      CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
>    --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
                    mailto:[log in to unmask]
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2