CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scott Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Scott Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:43:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On Jun 17.2005, at 14:07, Van Laan, Krista wrote:


> What are people doing as far as allowing font size adjustments on
> browser-based applications/portals?
>

font size should be adjustable, although perhaps not infinitely so.  
it seems only resonable to provide a small / medium / large mix in  
applications that are attempting to appeal to an audience of  
sufficient size. infinite adjustability is no truly realistic.


> While necessary for accessibility and baby-boomer customers, I am not
> sure whether companies are considering this, since it can wreck a
> carefully laid out design.
>

i'd agree with the the other poster's contention that this would not  
represent a "carefully laid out design" *IF* the requirement to allow  
for scalable font sizes was specified in the design briefing.

for a particularly horrible example of scalable type, check Canada's  
Globe and Mail (http://www.globeandmail.com/)

though it pains me to say so, i consider the globe's web site to be a  
pale and pathetic attempt by Canada's national newspaper.

    --------------------------------------------------------------
           Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2