Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:10:19 -0000
|
> However, from my own preferences and experience with searches, I think
> the following (at a minimum) should appear:
>
> Title of the page
> URL of the page
> Summary (or first 50 or so words of content -- not HTML tags!)
> Ranking (the goodness of the match between the query terms and the page)
> Date page was last altered
>
> Any suggestions?
From a personal viewpoint, I rarely find being presented with a "ranking"
value useful. It's certainly a good idea to order the results by whatever
ranking system you choose to put the most likely match first, but I've never
found that being given a number like "53%" to be of much guidance (unless of
course I've asked for the results to be listed in some order other than
"best match first").
A simple statement of how many hits had been found on the page might be more
useful, but that might be a bit bogus depending on your search algorithm
(e.g. if it uses any sort of "closeness" ranking). But to me, the ordering
of the search results is usually a good enough indicator.
Slainte,
Calum.
_____________________________________________________________________
CALUM BENSON 19 Apex Court, Woodlands,
Senior GUI Designer Bristol BS32 4JT, UK.
Division Ltd. +44 1454 615554 x248
mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.division.co.uk
"A designer has achieved perfection not when there is nothing
left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
|
|
|