LISTSERV - CHI-WEB Archives - LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	CHI-WEB Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:	[log in to unmask]
Date:	Sun, 7 Nov 1999 20:02:28 -0800
Reply-To:	"Kathy E. Gill" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: the new washingtonpost.com
From:	"Kathy E. Gill" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (13 lines)

At 12:31 PM -0600 11/4/99, Ward Conant wrote:
>The use of underlines on links (and the colors used to represent visited and
>unvisited links) were arbitrary decisions made by someone on the Mosaic team
>in the early days of Web browsers.

what about online help hypertext links? they are *all* underlined.

and have been, for some time.



Kathy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ACM.ORG