CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Marc Crawford <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 15:30:05 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed
X-cc:
Reply-To:
Marc Crawford <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On a lot of the top level pages (e.g., course overview pages), the only
major difference between 800x600 and 1024x768 is that the latter has some
white space on the right. However, when you dig deeper down, readability
gets worse on large browser windows. Instead of 10-14 words per line (which
I believe is good for overall readability), at 800x600 you're looking at
about 20 words per line. That makes scanning for info harder.

To compare common window sizes I recommend a tool called "Browser Sizer":
http://www.applythis.com/browsersizer/default.asp

Marc Crawford

Information Architect & Web Usability Consultant
OgilvyInteractive

>
>Everyone:
>
>If 800 pixels might be "just right" for some and "still too wide" for
>others,
>I'm interested in getting this list's reaction to http://www.learn.com/
>
>This site's home page has got to be on the high side of 1500 pixels...
>
>- John
>
>============================
>John C. Dailey, Ph.D.
>Assistant Professor Interactive Media
>Southwest Missouri State University
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2