CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:49:05 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Lisa Neal Gualtieri <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Rewarding evaluators
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Lisa Neal Gualtieri <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
A while ago there was a discussion here on how to reward evaluators.
Caroline Jarrett and I just pooled our collective experiences on this
topic in http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=opinion&article=105-1.
Please add your experiences and insights.

Lisa
-- 
Lisa Neal Gualtieri, Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief, eLearn Magazine, http://eLearnMag.org
Blog on education: http://blog.acm.org/elearn/
Adjunct Clinical Professor, Tufts University School of Medicine
Blog on health: http://lisaneal.com
Phone: 781-861-7373
Email: [log in to unmask]

    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
                    mailto:[log in to unmask]
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2