CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
invluding navigation on process pages
From:
Erica Gordon Sorohan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:38:36 -0800
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Erica Gordon Sorohan <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Has anyone had any firsthand experience with, or know of any research conducted on, the effect of including or not including global navigation on process pages? Our marketing department wants to eliminate global navigation on process pages (such as "register" and "subscribe"), arguing that navigation is a  "distraction" that causes users to abandon the process. Other business groups want to retain global navigation on all pages. Thoughts?




    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
                    mailto:[log in to unmask]
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------
      

ATOM RSS1 RSS2